基于熵权-层次分析法综合指标的电网关键线路辨识

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201909008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为准确辨识电网关键线路，首先从电网状态角度考虑，计及电网节点类型与线路负载率，基于泰尔熵理论提出电压变化量泰尔熵和潮流变化量泰尔熵；然后为使评估结果更符合复杂网络与实际电网结构模型，提出最大流传输贡献介数和平均接近中心性指标；最后结合熵权法和层次分析法对指标进行权重分配，得到既兼顾电网状态变化和电网拓扑结构，又结合客观数据并考虑主观经验的关键线路评估综合指标。通过IEEE 39节点标准系统进行测试，验证该综合指标的可行性和实用性。

关键词: 电网状态, 泰尔熵理论, 复杂网络, 电网结构, 熵权法, 层次分析法

Abstract: In order to accurately identify the key lines of the power grid, the paper firstly proposes the Theil entropy of voltage variation and power flow variation based on the Theil entropy theory, in view of the state of the power grid and with consideration of the types of grid nodes and line load rate. The maximum flow contribution betweenness and average closeness index is proposed, so as to make the evaluation results more consistent with the complex network and the actual grid structure model. the entropy weight method and the analytic hierarchy process are used to determine the weight of indexes, and the comprehensive evaluation index of the key lines are obtained, which not only takes into account the changes of the power grid state and the power grid structure, but also the objective data and subjective experience. The feasibility and practicability of the proposed comprehensive index are verified through the IEEE 39-bus system.

Key words: power grid state, Theil entropy theory, complex network, grid structure, entropy weight method, analytic hierarchy process

吴昊, 朱自伟. 基于熵权-层次分析法综合指标的电网关键线路辨识[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(5): 39-47,55.

WU Hao, ZHU Ziwei. Key Lines Identification in Power Grid Based on Comprehensive Index Calculated by the Entropy Weight-Analytical Hierarchy Process[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(5): 39-47,55.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201909008

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V53/I5/39

参考文献

[1] 胡学浩. 美加联合电网大面积停电事故的反思和启示[J]. 电网技术, 2003, 27(9): 2–6
HU Xuehao. Rethingking and enlightenment of large scope blackout in interconnected north America power grid[J]. Power System Technology, 2003, 27(9): 2–6
[2] 毛安家, 张戈力, 吕跃春, 等. 2011年9月8日美墨大停电事故的分析及其对我国电力调度运行管理的启示[J]. 电网技术, 2012, 36(4): 74–78
MAO Anjia, ZHANG Geli, LÜ Yuechun, et al. Analysis on large-scale blackout occurred in south America and north Mexico interconnected power grid on Sept.8, 2011 and lessons for electric power dispatching in China[J]. Power System Technology, 2012, 36(4): 74–78
[3] 汤涌, 卜广全, 易俊. 印度“7.30”、“7.31”大停电事故分析及启示[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2012, 32(25): 167–174, 23
TANG Yong, BU Guangquan, YI Jun. Analysis and lessons of the blackout in Indian power grid on July 30 and 31, 2012[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2012, 32(25): 167–174, 23
[4] BOMPARD E, NAPOLI R, XUE F. Analysis of structural vulnerabilities in power transmission grids[J]. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 2009, 2(1/2): 5–12.
[5] 李勇, 刘俊勇, 刘晓宇, 等. 基于潮流熵测度的连锁故障脆弱线路评估及其在四川主干电网中的应用[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2013, 33(10): 40–46
LI Yong, LIU Junyong, LIU Xiaoyu, et al. Vul-nerability assessment based on power flow entropy for lines in cascading failures and its application in Sichuan backbone power grid[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2013, 33(10): 40–46
[6] 李勇, 刘俊勇, 刘晓宇, 等. 基于潮流熵的电网连锁故障传播元件的脆弱性评估[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2012, 36(19): 11–16
LI Yong, LIU Junyong, LIU Xiaoyu, et al. Vulnerability assessment in power grid cascading failures based on entropy of power flow[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2012, 36(19): 11–16
[7] 赵阳, 李华强, 王伊渺, 等. 基于复杂网络理论和条件概率的灾难性事故风险评估方法[J]. 电网技术, 2013, 37(11): 3190–3196
ZHAO Yang, LI Huaqiang, WANG Yimiao, et al. A complex network theory and conditional probability based risk assessment method for disastrous accidents[J]. Power System Technology, 2013, 37(11): 3190–3196
[8] KINNEY R, CRUCITTI P, ALBERT R, et al. Modeling cascading failures in the North American power grid[J]. The European Physical Journal B, 2005, 46(1): 101–107.
[9] 曹一家, 陈晓刚, 孙可. 基于复杂网络理论的大型电力系统脆弱线路辨识[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2006, 26(12): 1–5, 31
CAO Yijia, CHEN Xiaogang, SUN Ke. Identification of vulnerable lines in power grid based on complex network theory[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2006, 26(12): 1–5, 31
[10] 徐林, 王秀丽, 王锡凡. 电气介数及其在电力系统关键线路识别中的应用[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2010, 30(1): 33–39
XU Lin, WANG Xiuli, WANG Xifan. Electric betweenness and its application in vulnerable line identification in power system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2010, 30(1): 33–39
[11] 徐林, 王秀丽, 王锡凡. 基于电气介数的电网连锁故障传播机制与积极防御[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2010, 30(13): 61–68
XU Lin, WANG Xiuli, WANG Xifan. Cascading failure mechanism in power grid based on electric betweenness and active defense[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2010, 30(13): 61–68
[12] 林冠强, 莫天文, 叶晓君, 等. 基于TOPSIS和CRITIC法的电网关键节点识别[J]. 高电压技术, 2018, 44(10): 3383–3389
LIN Guanqiang, MO Tianwen, YE Xiaojun, et al. Critical node identification of power networks based on TOPSIS and CRITIC methods[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2018, 44(10): 3383–3389
[13] 曾磊磊, 曾鑫, 吕嘉. 考虑网络结构和运行状态的电网脆弱线路辨识[J]. 智慧电力, 2018, 46(8): 8–12, 51
ZENG Leilei, ZENG Xin, LV Jia. Identification of vulnerable line of power grid in view of grid structure and running state[J]. Smart Power, 2018, 46(8): 8–12, 51
[14] 朱大锐, 王睿, 段建东, 等. 考虑多影响因素的关键输电线路辨识[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(20): 5938–5947, 6174
ZHU Darui, WANG Rui, DUAN Jiandong, et al. Identification of critical transmission lines considering multiple influencing factors[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(20): 5938–5947, 6174
[15] 倪良华, 闻佳妍, 张晓莲, 等. 基于受冲击与断开后果脆弱度的电网关键线路识别[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2020, 48(1): 81–87
NI Lianghua, WEN Jiayan, ZHANG Xiaolian, et al. Critical lines identification in power grid based on vulnerability of line under impact and disconnection consequence[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2020, 48(1): 81–87
[16] 宗祥瑞, 昌冲. 基于熵权法的电网运行状态特征分析与评价[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2016, 28(增刊1): 1–5
ZONG Xiangrui, CHANG Chong. Analysis and evaluation of operation state characteristics of power grid based on entropy weight method[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2016, 28(S1): 1–5
[17] 冷华, 童莹, 李欣然, 等. 配电网运行状态综合评估方法研究[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2017, 45(1): 53–59
LENG Hua, TONG Ying, LI Xinran, et al. Comprehensive evaluation method research of the operation state in distributed network[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2017, 45(1): 53–59
[18] 汪旸, 徐彪, 周超凡, 等. 基于层次分析法的输电断面综合监控方法[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(4): 89–95
WANG Yang, XU Biao, ZHOU Chaofan, et al. AHP-based comprehensive monitoring method of transmission section[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(4): 89–95
[19] 栾翔, 于群, 贺庆, 等. 考虑一致性风险价值的电网薄弱环节综合评估指标[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(6): 62–68
LUAN Xiang, YU Qun, HE Qing, et al. Integrated assessment index of power grid's weak links by considering coherent value at risk[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(6): 62–68
[20] 邓红雷, 戴栋, 李述文. 基于层次分析-熵权组合法的架空输电线路综合运行风险评估[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2017, 45(1): 28–34
DENG Honglei, DAI Dong, LI Shuwen. Comprehensive operation risk evaluation of overhead transmission line based on hierarchical analysis-entropy weight method[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2017, 45(1): 28–34
[21] 李晨, 殷自力, 王晓辉, 等. 基于层次分析法和熵权法的配电网调度评价[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2019, 31(7): 81–87
LI Chen, YIN Zili, WANG Xiaohui, et al. Assessment on distribution network dispatching based on analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2019, 31(7): 81–87