基于综合权重与TOPSIS法的光伏并网影响综合评价

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.04.154.06

中国电力 ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 154-159.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.04.154.06

基于综合权重与TOPSIS法的光伏并网影响综合评价

陈力¹,胡钋¹,杨德帅¹,刘典¹,王璟²,蒋小亮²

1. 武汉大学电气工程学院,湖北武汉 430072;
2. 国网河南省电力公司经济技术研究院,河南郑州 450052

收稿日期:2015-10-07 出版日期:2016-04-20 发布日期:2016-04-27
作者简介:陈力(1990-),男,湖北武汉人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为新能源并网技术。E-mail: cl564095463@sina.com
基金资助:
国网河南省电力公司科技项目(SGHAJY00GHJS1400030)

A Comprehensive Weighting and TOPSIS Method Based Assessment on the Impact of Grid-Connected PV Generation

CHEN Li¹, HU Po¹, YANG Deshuai¹, LIU Dian¹, WANG Jing², JIANG Xiaoliang²

1. School of Electrical Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China;
2. State Grid Henan Electric Power Company Economic Research Institute, Zhengzhou 450052, China

Received:2015-10-07 Online:2016-04-20 Published:2016-04-27
Supported by:
This work is supported by Science and Technology Project of State Grid Henan Power Company (No. SGHAJY00GHJS1400030).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对现有评价光伏并网影响指标不足或不尽合理的情况,提出了一套更为全面合理的两级化评价指标体系,对于一级和二级指标,分别采用主观赋权法和熵权法求取权重,从而得到二级指标的综合权重。采用综合权重和逼近理想解的排序方法(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution,TOPSIS)对光伏并网的影响进行评价,不仅可以体现主观赋权的优越性,同时还能充分利用各种数据信息使评价结果更符合实际情况。实例表明,该方法是一种合理有效的评价方法。

关键词: 光伏并网, 评价指标, 熵权法, 综合权重, TOPSIS法

Abstract: The current evaluation index for assessing the impact of grid-connected PV generation is neither adequate nor sufficiently meaningful. This paper proposes a more comprehensive two-stage evaluation index system. The weights of primary and secondary indexes are estimated based on the subjective weight method and the entropy method respectively. The comprehensive weight for the secondary index is then obtained. The comprehensive assessment of the impact of grid-connected PV generation based on comprehensive weights and TOPSIS(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution, TOPSIS) method can not only reflect the superiority of subjective weighting, but also make full use of data information to make the evaluation results more realistic. The case examples show that such approach is a reasonable and effective evaluation method.

Key words: grid-connected PV generation, evaluation index, entropy weight method, comprehensive weight, TOPSIS method

中图分类号:

TM615

陈力,胡钋,杨德帅,刘典,王璟,蒋小亮. 基于综合权重与TOPSIS法的光伏并网影响综合评价[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(4): 154-159.

CHEN Li, HU Po, YANG Deshuai, LIU Dian, WANG Jing, JIANG Xiaoliang. A Comprehensive Weighting and TOPSIS Method Based Assessment on the Impact of Grid-Connected PV Generation[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(4): 154-159.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.04.154.06

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2016/V49/I4/154

参考文献

[1] 丁明,王伟胜,王秀丽,等. 大规模光伏发电对电力系统影响综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2014,34(1)：1－14.
DING Ming, WANG Weisheng, WANG Xiuli, et al. A review on the effect of large-scale PV generation on power systems[J].Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34(1): 1-14.
[2] 周念成,周颖,池源,等. 新能源并网对配电网影响的正负效应综合评估[J]. 中国电力,2012,45(7)：62－67.
ZHOU Niancheng, ZHOU Ying, CHI Yuan, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of influence of renewable energy generation integration on distribution networks based on positive and negative effect indexes [J]. Electric Power, 2012, 45(7): 62-67.
[3] BIALASIEWICZ J T. Renewable energy systems with photovoltaic power generators: operation and modeling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2008, 55(7): 2752-2758.
[4] 李彦斌,于心怡,王致杰. 采用灰色关联度与TOPSIS法的光伏发电项目风险评价研究[J]. 电网技术,2013,37(6)：1514－1519.
LI Yanbin, YU Xinyi, WANG Zhijie. Risk assessment on photovoltaic power generation project by grey correlation analysis and TOPSIS method[J]. Power System Technology, 2013, 37(6):1514-1519.
[5] 韩亮,王守相,赵歌. 基于区间TOPSIS与遗传算法混合的分布式电源优化配置[J]. 电力系统自动化,2013,37(24)：37－42.
HAN Liang, WANG Shouxiang, ZHAO Ge. Optimal planning of distributed generators based on combination of interval TOPSIS method and genetic algorithm[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2013, 37(24): 37-42.
[6] 张文朝,顾雪平. 应用变异系数法和逼近理想解排序法的风电场综合评价[J]. 电网技术,2014,38(10)：2741－2746.
ZHANG Wenchao, GU Xueping. Comprehensive evaluation of wind farms using variation coefficient method and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution[J]. Power System Technology, 2014, 38(10): 2741-2746.
[7] 谢宁,罗安,马伏军,等. 大型光伏电站与电网谐波交互影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2013,33(34)：9－16.
XIE Ning, LUO An, MA Fujun, et al. Harmonic interaction between large-scale photovoltaic power stations and grids[J].Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(34): 9-16.
[8] 肖淳,邵东国,杨丰顺. 基于改进TOPSIS法的流域初始水权分配模型[J]. 武汉大学学报：工学版,2012,45(3)：329－334.
XIAO Chun, SHAO Dongguo, YANG Fengshun. A model of initial water rights allocation in watershed based on improved TOPSIS method[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University,2012, 45(3): 329-334.
[9] 李磊,金菊良,朱永楠. TOPSIS方法应用中若干问题的探讨[J].水电能源科学,2012,30(3)：51－54.
LI Lei, JIN Juliang, ZHU Yongnan. Discussion on some problems of application of TOPSIS method [J]. Water Resources and Power,2012, 30(3): 51-54.
[10] JAHANSHAHLOO G R, HOSSEINZADEH L, IZADIKHA M. An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 175(2): 1375-1384.
[11] 吕盼,乔怡,葛丽婷. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的输电网规划综合决策[J]. 华北电力大学学报,2010,37(4)：24－28.
Lv Pan, QIAO Yi, GE Liting. Comprehensive decision-making of transmission network planning based on entropy TOPSIS[J].Journal of North China Electric Power University, 2010, 37(4): 24-28.

[1]	刘雨姗, 陈俊儒, 常喜强, 刘牧阳. 构网型储能变流器并网性能的多层级评价指标体系及应用[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(3): 193-203.
[2]	乔俊峰, 周爱华, 彭林, 王一清, 沈晓峰, 潘森, 杨佩, 黄晨宏. 基于多源数据深度融合的配电网运行评价方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(6): 193-203.
[3]	贾开华, 于云霞, 范秀波, 李茂轩, 王东, 唐翠翠, 冀章. 基于AHP-EWM综合赋权和TOPSIS法的多能互补系统综合评价[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(7): 228-238.
[4]	贾巍, 雷才嘉, 方兵华, 刘涌. 供电分区场景下基于数据驱动的负荷密度综合评估及预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(6): 71-81.
[5]	赵源上, 林伟芳. 基于皮尔逊相关系数融合密度峰值和熵权法典型场景研究[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(5): 193-202.
[6]	汪泽州, 张明明, 钱峰强, 周弘毅, 于浩淼. 含光伏接入的中压配电网集中调控优化策略[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(2): 15-22.
[7]	刘向向, 张森林, 朱思乔, 马瑞. 基于灰靶理论和谱聚类的虚拟电厂多形态柔性资源聚合模型[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(11): 104-112.
[8]	梁海平, 石皓岩, 王岩, 刘英培, 王鑫明. 基于提升韧性的输电网灾后应急维修策略优化[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(3): 142-151.
[9]	赵洪山, 李静璇. 基于PSR和改进灰色TOPSIS的园区客户能效评估模型[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(3): 203-212.
[10]	方彤, 蒋东方, 杨洋, 袁铁江. 基于NSGA-II和熵权法的氢综合能源系统商业运营模式[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(1): 110-118.
[11]	熊小萍, 郝邵磊, 孙帝, 林光阳, 李航. 基于改进蜂群算法的独立二次一体化中心优化选址策略[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(9): 1-8.
[12]	谢敬东, 陆池鑫, 鲁思薇, 孙波, 黄溪滢, 孙欣. 基于序关系-熵权法的电力市场风险评估[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(6): 71-78.
[13]	王思华, 陈龙, 王军军, 赵磊. 复合绝缘子伞套老化状态模糊综合评估[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(5): 156-165.
[14]	项胤兴, 林济铿. 基于综合权重和改进ELECTRE法的黑启动方案评估[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(3): 159-167.
[15]	徐遵义, 刘文慧, 张旭冉, 张海燕. 基于数据驱动的浆液循环泵运行优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(3): 197-204.

基于综合权重与TOPSIS法的光伏并网影响综合评价

A Comprehensive Weighting and TOPSIS Method Based Assessment on the Impact of Grid-Connected PV Generation

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

模态框（Modal）标题

基于综合权重与TOPSIS法的光伏并网影响综合评价

A Comprehensive Weighting and TOPSIS Method Based Assessment on the Impact of Grid-Connected PV Generation

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics