中国电力 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (3): 114-124.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202506024
陶顺1(
), 陈慧琳2(
), 徐永海1(
), 周胜军3(
), 肖湘宁1
收稿日期:2025-06-10
修回日期:2026-01-25
发布日期:2026-03-16
出版日期:2026-03-28
作者简介:基金资助:
TAO Shun1(
), CHEN Huilin2(
), XU Yonghai1(
), ZHOU Shengjun3(
), XIAO Xiangning1
Received:2025-06-10
Revised:2026-01-25
Online:2026-03-16
Published:2026-03-28
Supported by:摘要:
GB/T 14549自颁布实施以来,有效监督了电网中的谐波问题,保证了电能质量。随着新型电力系统的发展,电网中的谐波呈现新特征,GB/T 14549难以完全适应当前电网发展与现代管理需求。针对新型电力系统中的谐波特征,基于GB/T 14549的谐波电流允许值分配方法,分别针对总谐波电流约束指标、供电容量取值方法和叠加方法,给出关键参数的取值方法,通过案例验证其合理性与有效性,有效约束了谐波注入,为谐波国家标准修订提供参考。
陶顺, 陈慧琳, 徐永海, 周胜军, 肖湘宁. 谐波电流允许值分配关键参数取值方法[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59(3): 114-124.
TAO Shun, CHEN Huilin, XU Yonghai, ZHOU Shengjun, XIAO Xiangning. Key parameter selection method for allocation of allowable harmonic current values[J]. Electric Power, 2026, 59(3): 114-124.
| h | 3 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 13 | 9 |>13 |偶次 |
| α | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2 |
表 1 相位叠加系数α的值
Table 1 The value of phase superposition coefficient
| h | 3 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 13 | 9 |>13 |偶次 |
| α | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2 |
| h | h<5 | 5≤h≤10 | h>10 |
| α | 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.0 |
表 2 IEC叠加系数α的值
Table 2 The value of IEC superposition coefficient
| h | h<5 | 5≤h≤10 | h>10 |
| α | 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 指标 | 约束前 | 约束后 | |||
| 母线3 | 母线4 | 母线3 | 母线4 | ||
| I3/A | 25.46 | 12.45 | 18.61 | 10.28 | |
| I5/A | 75.75 | 39.48 | 55.38 | 32.59 | |
| I7/A | 68.61 | 35.71 | 50.16 | 29.48 | |
| I9/A | 42.72 | 23.90 | 31.23 | 19.73 | |
| 24.36 | 20.01 | 17.81 | 16.52 | ||
| 17.81 | 16.52 | 17.81 | 16.52 | ||
| 2.82 | 2.74 | 2.06 | 2.26 | ||
表 3 约束前后主频次谐波及指标
Table 3 Harmonics and indicators before and after the limit
| 指标 | 约束前 | 约束后 | |||
| 母线3 | 母线4 | 母线3 | 母线4 | ||
| I3/A | 25.46 | 12.45 | 18.61 | 10.28 | |
| I5/A | 75.75 | 39.48 | 55.38 | 32.59 | |
| I7/A | 68.61 | 35.71 | 50.16 | 29.48 | |
| I9/A | 42.72 | 23.90 | 31.23 | 19.73 | |
| 24.36 | 20.01 | 17.81 | 16.52 | ||
| 17.81 | 16.52 | 17.81 | 16.52 | ||
| 2.82 | 2.74 | 2.06 | 2.26 | ||
| 母线 | 供电容量/(MV·A) | ||
| IEC/TR 61000-3-6 | GB | ||
| 2 | 0 | 240 | 320 (含电源类用户) |
| 3 | 140 | ||
| 4 | 180(含电源类用户 供电的负荷) | ||
| 供电容量之和 | 320 | — | — |
表 4 电源类用户接入后各母线供电容量
Table 4 Power supply capacity of each bus after grid-connection of power supply users
| 母线 | 供电容量/(MV·A) | ||
| IEC/TR 61000-3-6 | GB | ||
| 2 | 0 | 240 | 320 (含电源类用户) |
| 3 | 140 | ||
| 4 | 180(含电源类用户 供电的负荷) | ||
| 供电容量之和 | 320 | — | — |
| 电压等级/kV | 汇流母线 | 出线/进线数量 |
| 10 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 35 | 9 | 4 |
| 110 | 10 | 3 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2 |
表 5 各电压等级汇流母线进/出线数量
Table 5 The number of incoming/outgoing bus lines of each voltage level
| 电压等级/kV | 汇流母线 | 出线/进线数量 |
| 10 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 35 | 9 | 4 |
| 110 | 10 | 3 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2 |
| 谐波 次数 | 谐波电流/A | ||||||||||
| A | B | C | D | ||||||||
| 幅值 | 相位 | 幅值 | 相位 | 幅值 | 相位 | 幅值 | 相位 | ||||
| 2 | 0.02 | 5.59 | 0.04 | 4.53 | 0.03 | 2.86 | 0.01 | 6.18 | |||
| 3 | 0.04 | 4.87 | 0.27 | 2.83 | 0.06 | 2.62 | 0.06 | 0.03 | |||
| 4 | 0.01 | 4.21 | 0.01 | 1.54 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 1.17 | |||
| 5 | 0.10 | 4.72 | 2.04 | 3.31 | 0.43 | 2.75 | 0.55 | 4.82 | |||
| 6 | 0.01 | 1.55 | 0.01 | 2.11 | 0.01 | 3.84 | 0.00 | 0.98 | |||
| 8 | 0.01 | 5.09 | 0.01 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 5.79 | 0.00 | 5.58 | |||
| 9 | 0.01 | 3.79 | 0.06 | 1.30 | 0.01 | 1.16 | 0.01 | 1.33 | |||
| 10 | 0.01 | 3.47 | 0.01 | 3.40 | 0.00 | 5.18 | 0.00 | 3.91 | |||
| 11 | 0.03 | 3.95 | 0.45 | 4.26 | 0.11 | 2.89 | 0.26 | 0.69 | |||
| 13 | 0.02 | 5.47 | 0.30 | 4.51 | 0.01 | 4.58 | 0.19 | 5.01 | |||
表 6 汇流母线9谐波电流实测数据
Table 6 Measured data of harmonic current of the confluence bus bar 9
| 谐波 次数 | 谐波电流/A | ||||||||||
| A | B | C | D | ||||||||
| 幅值 | 相位 | 幅值 | 相位 | 幅值 | 相位 | 幅值 | 相位 | ||||
| 2 | 0.02 | 5.59 | 0.04 | 4.53 | 0.03 | 2.86 | 0.01 | 6.18 | |||
| 3 | 0.04 | 4.87 | 0.27 | 2.83 | 0.06 | 2.62 | 0.06 | 0.03 | |||
| 4 | 0.01 | 4.21 | 0.01 | 1.54 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 1.17 | |||
| 5 | 0.10 | 4.72 | 2.04 | 3.31 | 0.43 | 2.75 | 0.55 | 4.82 | |||
| 6 | 0.01 | 1.55 | 0.01 | 2.11 | 0.01 | 3.84 | 0.00 | 0.98 | |||
| 8 | 0.01 | 5.09 | 0.01 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 5.79 | 0.00 | 5.58 | |||
| 9 | 0.01 | 3.79 | 0.06 | 1.30 | 0.01 | 1.16 | 0.01 | 1.33 | |||
| 10 | 0.01 | 3.47 | 0.01 | 3.40 | 0.00 | 5.18 | 0.00 | 3.91 | |||
| 11 | 0.03 | 3.95 | 0.45 | 4.26 | 0.11 | 2.89 | 0.26 | 0.69 | |||
| 13 | 0.02 | 5.47 | 0.30 | 4.51 | 0.01 | 4.58 | 0.19 | 5.01 | |||
| 谐波次数 | 谐波电流幅值/A | |||||
| 相位叠 加结果 | GB | IEC/TR 61000-3-6 | ||||
| 叠加结果 | 误差 | 叠加结果 | 误差 | |||
| 2 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.10 | |
| 3 | 0.25 | 0.70 | 0.45 | 0.80 | 0.55 | |
| 4 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.04 | |
| 5 | 2.49 | 6.72 | 4.23 | 5.82 | 3.33 | |
| 6 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | |
| 8 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| 9 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.05 | |
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| 11 | 0.26 | 1.65 | 1.39 | 1.56 | 1.30 | |
| 13 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.14 | 0.63 | 0.13 | |
表 7 谐波电流叠加结果误差
Table 7 The error of harmonic current superposition results
| 谐波次数 | 谐波电流幅值/A | |||||
| 相位叠 加结果 | GB | IEC/TR 61000-3-6 | ||||
| 叠加结果 | 误差 | 叠加结果 | 误差 | |||
| 2 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.10 | |
| 3 | 0.25 | 0.70 | 0.45 | 0.80 | 0.55 | |
| 4 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.04 | |
| 5 | 2.49 | 6.72 | 4.23 | 5.82 | 3.33 | |
| 6 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | |
| 8 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| 9 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.05 | |
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| 11 | 0.26 | 1.65 | 1.39 | 1.56 | 1.30 | |
| 13 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.14 | 0.63 | 0.13 | |
| 谐波 次数 | 误差均值/A | |
| 汇流母线9 | ||
| GB | IEC | |
| 2 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
| 3 | 0.45 | 0.55 |
| 4 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| 5 | 4.23 | 3.33 |
| 6 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 8 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 9 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 11 | 1.39 | 1.30 |
| 13 | 0.14 | 0.13 |
表 9 35 kV相位叠加系数误差均值
Table 9 The mean error of 35 kV phase superposition coefficient
| 谐波 次数 | 误差均值/A | |
| 汇流母线9 | ||
| GB | IEC | |
| 2 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
| 3 | 0.45 | 0.55 |
| 4 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| 5 | 4.23 | 3.33 |
| 6 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 8 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 9 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 11 | 1.39 | 1.30 |
| 13 | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| 谐波 次数 | 误差均值/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 汇流母线1 | 汇流母线2 | 汇流母线3 | 汇流母线4 | 汇流母线5 | 汇流母线6 | 汇流母线7 | 汇流母线8 | ||||||||||||||||
| GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | ||||||||
| 2 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.49 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 1.59 | 2.23 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.16 | |||||||
| 3 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 3.83 | 4.26 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 2.18 | 1.90 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 1.17 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.95 | |||||||
| 4 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.57 | 1.21 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.05 | |||||||
| 5 | 1.65 | 1.35 | 12.61 | 4.82 | 15.48 | 13.47 | 14.87 | 15.31 | 28.50 | 25.80 | 0.91 | 1.42 | 9.32 | 14.26 | 9.89 | 9.01 | |||||||
| 6 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 1.29 | 1.41 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |||||||
| 8 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |||||||
| 9 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.41 | 0.57 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.20 | |||||||
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |||||||
| 11 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 3.70 | 4.07 | 1.97 | 1.83 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 2.26 | 2.05 | 1.95 | 2.00 | 1.79 | 1.51 | 1.83 | 1.86 | |||||||
| 13 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 1.59 | 1.53 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 1.25 | 1.21 | 1.07 | 1.08 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 1.73 | 1.75 | |||||||
表 8 10 kV相位叠加系数误差均值
Table 8 The mean error of 10 kV phase superposition coefficient
| 谐波 次数 | 误差均值/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 汇流母线1 | 汇流母线2 | 汇流母线3 | 汇流母线4 | 汇流母线5 | 汇流母线6 | 汇流母线7 | 汇流母线8 | ||||||||||||||||
| GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | ||||||||
| 2 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.49 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 1.59 | 2.23 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.16 | |||||||
| 3 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 3.83 | 4.26 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 2.18 | 1.90 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 1.17 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.95 | |||||||
| 4 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.57 | 1.21 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.05 | |||||||
| 5 | 1.65 | 1.35 | 12.61 | 4.82 | 15.48 | 13.47 | 14.87 | 15.31 | 28.50 | 25.80 | 0.91 | 1.42 | 9.32 | 14.26 | 9.89 | 9.01 | |||||||
| 6 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 1.29 | 1.41 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |||||||
| 8 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |||||||
| 9 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.41 | 0.57 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.20 | |||||||
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |||||||
| 11 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 3.70 | 4.07 | 1.97 | 1.83 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 2.26 | 2.05 | 1.95 | 2.00 | 1.79 | 1.51 | 1.83 | 1.86 | |||||||
| 13 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 1.59 | 1.53 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 1.25 | 1.21 | 1.07 | 1.08 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 1.73 | 1.75 | |||||||
| 谐波 次数 | 误差均值/A | ||||||||||
| 汇流母线10 | 汇流母线11 | 汇流母线12 | 汇流母线13 | ||||||||
| GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | ||||
| 2 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.09 | |||
| 3 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 0.63 | |||
| 4 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.06 | |||
| 5 | 0.22 | 0.32 | 3.56 | 3.54 | 2.86 | 3.08 | 2.13 | 2.49 | |||
| 6 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | |||
| 8 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | |||
| 9 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |||
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |||
| 11 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 1.14 | 1.08 | |||
| 13 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.62 | 0.60 | |||
表 10 110 kV相位叠加系数误差均值
Table 10 The mean error of 110 kV phase superposition coefficient
| 谐波 次数 | 误差均值/A | ||||||||||
| 汇流母线10 | 汇流母线11 | 汇流母线12 | 汇流母线13 | ||||||||
| GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | GB | IEC | ||||
| 2 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.09 | |||
| 3 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 0.63 | |||
| 4 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.06 | |||
| 5 | 0.22 | 0.32 | 3.56 | 3.54 | 2.86 | 3.08 | 2.13 | 2.49 | |||
| 6 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | |||
| 8 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | |||
| 9 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |||
| 10 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |||
| 11 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 1.14 | 1.08 | |||
| 13 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.62 | 0.60 | |||
| 1 | 孙秋野, 隋政麒, 王睿, 等. “双高”电力系统非经典稳定性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43 (S1): 1- 13. |
| SUN Qiuye, SUI Zhengqi, WANG Rui, et al. Non-classical stability analysis of power system with high shares of renewables and power electronics[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43 (S1): 1- 13. | |
| 2 |
成和祥. 基于双馈风机短路特性的风电场集电线路继电保护整定方法研究[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2020, 48 (16): 93- 99.
|
|
CHENG Hexiang. Discussion on setting scheme of collecting line relay protection in wind farm based on a DFIG short-circuit characteristic[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2020, 48 (16): 93- 99.
|
|
| 3 |
AZEREDO L F S, YAHYAOUI I, FIOROTTI R, et al. Study of reducing losses, short-circuit currents and harmonics by allocation of distributed generation, capacitor banks and fault current limiters in distribution grids[J]. Applied Energy, 2023, 350, 121760.
|
| 4 |
YIN S L, SUN Y Y, XU Q S, et al. Multi-harmonic sources identification and evaluation method based on cloud-edge-end collaboration[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2024, 156, 109681.
|
| 5 |
朱继忠, 高美云, 肖鹏飞, 等. 大规模海上风电并网与运行技术综述[J]. 电力工程技术, 2025, 44 (5): 2- 24.
|
|
ZHU Jizhong, GAO Meiyun, XIAO Pengfei, et al. Review of grid integration and operation technologies for large-scale offshore wind power[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2025, 44 (5): 2- 24.
|
|
| 6 |
高明, 曾平良, 冯永朝. 新型电力系统中的虚拟电厂研究综述[J]. 电力工程技术, 2025, 44 (6): 143- 154.
|
|
GAO Ming, ZENG Pingliang, FENG Yongchao. Review of virtual power plant in new power system[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2025, 44 (6): 143- 154.
|
|
| 7 |
闫旭峰, 王协康. 以深化抽水蓄能持续发展助力我国能源革命战略深入推进[J]. 中国发展, 2024, 24 (4): 32- 37.
|
|
YAN Xufeng, WANG Xiekang. Deepening the sustainable development of pumped storage to help further promote China's energy revolution strategy[J]. China Development, 2024, 24 (4): 32- 37.
|
|
| 8 |
王东波, 闫琨. 基于多边共建电能发展新格局的能源革命探索与实践[J]. 山西电力, 2023 (2): 1- 4.
|
|
WANG Dongbo, YAN Kun. Exploration and practice of energy revolution based on the new pattern of multilateral co-construction of electric energy development[J]. Shanxi Electric Power, 2023 (2): 1- 4.
|
|
| 9 | 刘若涵, 刘旭中. 新型电力系统多元灵活资源调控运行策略[J]. 中国科技信息, 2025 (5): 77- 79. |
| LIU Ruohan, LIU Xuzhong. New power system multiple flexible resource control operation strategy[J]. China Science and Technology Information, 2025 (5): 77- 79. | |
| 10 |
刘可, 王轩, 王杨, 等. 静止无功发生器谐波模型及其对谐振影响分析[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55 (9): 174- 182.
|
|
LIU Ke, WANG Xuan, WANG Yang, et al. Harmonic model of static var generator and analysis of its resonance influence[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55 (9): 174- 182.
|
|
| 11 |
付豪, 杨星磊, 张斌, 等. 考虑大规模新能源接入的变压器热寿命损失分析[J]. 电力科学与技术学报, 2020, 35 (6): 53- 60.
|
|
FU Hao, YANG Xinglei, ZHANG Bin, et al. Analysis of transformer thermal life loss considering large-scale new energy resources access[J]. Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology, 2020, 35 (6): 53- 60.
|
|
| 12 |
李嘉彬, 杨建华, 张涛, 等. 电力电子设备谐波对配电网电压骤升的影响研究[J]. 智慧电力, 2021, 49 (5): 35- 41, 84.
|
|
LI Jiabin, YANG Jianhua, ZHANG Tao, et al. Harmonic impact of power electronic devices upon voltage swell in distribution networks[J]. Smart Power, 2021, 49 (5): 35- 41, 84.
|
|
| 13 | 安小宇, 张涛, 李琰琰, 等. 电容分裂式变换器模型预测三相不平衡治理策略[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2020, 48 (13): 142- 148. |
| AN Xiaoyu, ZHANG Tao, LI Yanyan, et al. Model predictive three phase unbalance controlling strategy for split capacitor converter[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2020, 48 (13): 142- 148. | |
| 14 | RIBEIRO P F. Common misapplications of the IEEE 519 harmonic standard: Voltage or current limits[C]//2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century. Pittsburgh: IEEE, 2008: 1–3. |
| 15 |
MICHALEC Ł, JASIŃSKI M, SIKORSKI T, et al. Impact of harmonic currents of nonlinear loads on power quality of a low voltage network–review and case study[J]. Energies, 2021, 14 (12): 3665.
|
| 16 |
HU Z, HAN Y, ZALHAF A S, et al. Harmonic sources modeling and characterization in modern power systems: a comprehensive overview[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2023, 218, 109234.
|
| 17 |
苏寅生, 周挺辉, 赵利刚, 等. 电力电子设备谐波对主网的影响分析与对策探索[J]. 南方电网技术, 2024, 18 (2): 47- 56.
|
|
SU Yinsheng, ZHOU Tinghui, ZHAO Ligang, et al. Impact analysis and countermeasure exploration of power electronic equipment harmonics on main network[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2024, 18 (2): 47- 56.
|
|
| 18 |
解绍锋, 李群湛, 赵丽平. 谐波国家标准有关问题的探讨[J]. 电网技术, 2006, 30 (13): 94- 97.
|
|
XIE Shaofeng, LI Qunzhan, ZHAO Liping. Some discussion of state standard of harmonics[J]. Power System Technology, 2006, 30 (13): 94- 97.
|
|
| 19 | GOSBELL V J, BROWNE T J, PERERA S. Harmonic allocation using IEC/TR 61000-3-6 at the distribution/transmission interface[C]//2008 13th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power. Wollongong: IEEE, 2008: 1–6. |
| 20 | 国家技术监督局. 电能质量 公用电网谐波: GB/T 14549—1993[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1994. |
| 21 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 3-6: Limits - Assessment of emission limits for the connection of distorting installations to MV, HV and EHV power systems: IEC/TR 61000-3-6[S]. Geneva: IEC, 2021. |
| 22 | Energy Networks Association (ENA). Harmonic voltage distortion and the connection of harmonic sources and/or resonant plant to transmission systems and distribution networks in the United Kingdom[R]. London: ENA, 2020. |
| 23 | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). IEEE standard for harmonic control in electric power systems: IEEE 519—2022[S]. New York: IEEE, 2022. |
| 24 | 吴命利. IEEE Std 519—2014谐波标准简介[J]. 山西电力, 2016 (5): 70- 72. |
| WU Mingli. An introduction to the IEEE std 519: 2014 harmonic standard[J]. Shanxi Electric Power, 2016 (5): 70- 72. | |
| 25 |
董武, 张健, 周勤勇, 等. 中国电力系统安全稳定性演化综述[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58 (1): 115- 127.
|
|
DONG Wu, ZHANG Jian, ZHOU Qinyong, et al. An overview of the evolution of security and stability of China's power system[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58 (1): 115- 127.
|
|
| 26 | 柳瑶斌. 新能源发电在电力系统中的应用探讨[J]. 中国设备工程, 2025 (9): 96- 98. |
| LIU Yaobin. Discussion on the application of new energy power generation in power system[J]. China Plant Engineering, 2025 (9): 96- 98. | |
| 27 |
宗万波, 殷晶, 陈旭云. 适应新型电力系统的灵活性水电建设研究[J]. 水力发电, 2025, 51 (11): 7- 11.
|
|
ZONG Wanbo, YIN Jing, CHEN Xuyun. The construction of flexible hydropower adapted to the new power system[J]. Water Power, 2025, 51 (11): 7- 11.
|
|
| 28 | WANG C S, LUO F Z, BAI H, et al. An evaluation method for power supply capacity of distribution system[C]//2008 Third International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies. Nanjing: IEEE, 2008: 1244–1248. |
| 29 |
孟浩, 杨春霞. 住宅小区公建供电容量计算[J]. 山西建筑, 2018, 44 (28): 98- 99.
|
|
MENG Hao, YANG Chunxia. The calculation of power supply capacity for residential community[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2018, 44 (28): 98- 99.
|
|
| 30 |
文稳利. 电气化铁路牵引供电容量优化的研究[J]. 运输经理世界, 2021 (21): 17- 19.
|
|
WEN Wenli. Research on optimization of traction power supply capacity of electrified railway[J]. Transport Business China, 2021 (21): 17- 19.
|
|
| 31 |
陶顺, 陈慧琳, 徐永海, 等. 高压系统公共连接点处允许谐波发射值分配方法对比[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58 (1): 1- 14.
|
|
TAO Shun, CHEN Huilin, XU Yonghai, et al. Comparison of allowable harmonic emission value distribution methods at the point of common coupling of high voltage system[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58 (1): 1- 14.
|
|
| 32 |
高敏, 朱明星, 汪清, 等. 考虑相位分布特征的多谐波源叠加方法[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2023, 35 (12): 127- 133.
|
|
GAO Min, ZHU Mingxing, WANG Qing, et al. Multi-harmonic source superposition method considering phase distribution characteristics[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2023, 35 (12): 127- 133.
|
|
| 33 | MORTON A B. Least-squares estimation of power law for aggregation of harmonic currents[C]//2023 IEEE International Conference on Energy Technologies for Future Grids (ETFG). Wollongong: IEEE, 2024: 1–5. |
| 34 | Underwriters Laboratories (UL). UL Standard for safety for dry-type general purpose and power transformers: UL 1561 2011-04[S]. Northbrook: UL, 2011. |
| 35 | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). Recommended practice for establishing liquid immersed and dry-type power and distribution transformer capability when supplying nonsinusoidal load currents: IEEE C57.110[S]. New York: IEEE, 2018. |
| [1] | 陶顺, 陈慧琳, 徐永海, 周胜军, 肖湘宁. 高压系统公共连接点处允许谐波发射值分配方法对比[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(1): 1-14. |
| [2] | 宋一凡, 赵贺, 沈俊言, 陶顺, 马喜欢, 徐永海. GB/T 14549—93与IEEE std.519:2014谐波电流限值确定方法对比[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(7): 42-48. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||


AI小编