考虑电压暂降治理设备服役年限的优质供电服务模式

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202110029

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 电压暂降治理设备存在一次性投资成本大、投资门槛高的问题，亟须一种新型优质供电服务模式解决该问题。提出一种考虑电压暂降治理设备服役年限的优质供电服务模式（HPSL）。首先，提出HPSL运营模式，明确了HPSL运营主体和服务流程，如果旧设备能够满足用户的使用需求，则使用旧设备参与治理。其次，综合考虑了设备商和用户的成本、收益构成，以双方的净收益最大为目标，建立HPSL服务定价优化模型。然后，建立基于Stackelberg博弈的服务费博弈模型，模型以设备商调整附加收益系数为决策、用户调整服务时长为响应，符合现实情况。采用改进遗传算法求解模型。最后，以某大型胶片生产厂为例进行实例分析，证明了该模式可以降低用户的治理成本，提升设备商的服务费收益。

关键词: 电压暂降, 优质供电服务模式, Stackelberg博弈, 治理设备服役年限, 改进遗传算法

Abstract: The voltage sag mitigation equipment has such problems as large one-time investment cost and high investment threshold, which urgently need to be solved through a new high quality power supply service mode. Therefore, a high quality power supply mode considering the service life of mitigation equipment against voltage sag (HPSL) is proposed. Firstly, a HPSL operation mode is proposed and the operation entities and service process of HPSL are defined. And it is proposed that the old equipment shall participate in the mitigation management if they can meet the user's needs. Secondly, a HPSL service pricing optimization model is established with a comprehensive consideration of the cost and income composition of equipment manufacturers and users, and with the maximum net income of both parties as objective. Furthermore, a service fee game model is established based on the Stackelberg game. The model takes the adjustment of additional income coefficient by equipment manufacturers as the decision-making, and the adjustment of service duration by users as the response, which is in line with the actual situation. The improved genetic algorithm is used to solve the model. Finally, a case study is conducted by taking a large film factory as an example. It is proved that the proposed mode can reduce the governance cost of users, and improve the service fee income of equipment manufacturers.

Key words: voltage sag, high quality power supply service mode, Stackelberg game, service life of mitigation equipment, improved genetic algorithm

李培, 俞永军, 马智泉, 蔡重凯. 考虑电压暂降治理设备服役年限的优质供电服务模式[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(12): 147-159.

LI Pei, YU Yongjun, MA Zhiquan, CAI Chongkai. High Quality Power Supply Service Mode Considering Service Life of Mitigation Equipment Against Voltage Sag[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(12): 147-159.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202110029

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V55/I12/147

参考文献

[1] 张军, 浦天宇. 多层次电压暂降评价方法研究[J]. 电力工程技术, 2018, 37(6): 49–54
ZHANG Jun, PU Tianyu. Multi-level evaluation method of voltage sag[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2018, 37(6): 49–54
[2] 杨桢, 马钰超, 李丽, 等. 基于HHT和GA-BP的电压暂降源定位方法[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(3): 97–104
YANG Zhen, MA Yuchao, LI Li, et al. A novel method for voltage sag source location based on HHT and GA-BP[J]. Electric Power, 2022, 55(3): 97–104
[3] HE H Y, ZHANG W H, WANG Y, et al. A sensitive industrial process model for financial losses assessment due to voltage sag and short interruptions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2021, 36(3): 1293–1301.
[4] WANG Y, YANG Y X, XIAO X Y, et al. Configuration strategy of shared mitigation equipment for voltage sag considering the demands of users[J]. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2020, 14(25): 6338–6347.
[5] 张宸宇, 史明明, 范忠, 等. 电压暂降事件分类及短路类型识别研究[J]. 电力工程技术, 2018, 37(2): 102–107,113
ZHANG Chenyu, SHI Mingming, FAN Zhong, et al. Research on voltage sag event classification and short circuit type identification[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2018, 37(2): 102–107,113
[6] 李春海, 李华强, 刘勃江. 基于过程免疫不确定性的工业用户电压暂降经济损失风险评估[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2016, 36(12): 136–142
LI Chunhai, LI Huaqiang, LIU Bojiang. Risk assessment based on process immunity uncertainty for industrial customers' financial losses due to voltage sags[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2016, 36(12): 136–142
[7] 张逸, 李为明, 林芳, 等. 基于电气特性–物理属性的工业用户电压暂降缓减策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(2): 632–642
ZHANG Yi, LI Weiming, LIN Fang, et al. Voltage sag mitigation strategy for industrial users based on process electrical characteristics-physical attribute[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(2): 632–642
[8] 郑颖, 刘旭娜, 刘阳, 等. 基于过程免疫时间和可接受后果状态的优质园区供电质量等级划分[J]. 电网技术, 2014, 38(1): 211–216
ZHENG Ying, LIU Xuna, LIU Yang, et al. Classification of power supply quality levels for premium power park based on process immunity time and acceptable resulting status[J]. Power System Technology, 2014, 38(1): 211–216
[9] 郑志宇, 李雅倩, 谢雪景, 等. 基于全寿命周期成本的电压暂降治理设备综合配置规划[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2018, 46(18): 128–134
ZHENG Zhiyu, LI Yaqian, XIE Xuejing, et al. Allocation plan of voltage sags mitigation devices based on life cycle cost[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2018, 46(18): 128–134
[10] 李文峰, 武玉丰, 白宏坤, 等. 基于电力增值服务的电压暂降治理模式研究[J]. 电测与仪表, 2019, 56(17): 36–41,52
LI Wenfeng, WU Yufeng, BAI Hongkun, et al. Research of voltage sags control mode based on power value-added services[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2019, 56(17): 36–41,52
[11] 刘阳, 肖先勇, 刘旭娜, 等. 考虑用户定量需求的优质电力园区DVR优化配置[J]. 电网技术, 2015, 39(3): 823–828
LIU Yang, XIAO Xianyong, LIU Xuna, et al. Optimal configuration of DVR in premium power park considering customers' quantitative demand[J]. Power System Technology, 2015, 39(3): 823–828
[12] 张博, 唐钰政, 代双寅, 等. 供用电双方满意的电压暂降治理增值服务策略[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(11): 50–59
ZHANG Bo, TANG Yuzheng, DAI Shuangyin, et al. Value-added service strategy of voltage sag governance for mutual satisfaction of power supply companies and power users[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(11): 50–59
[13] 闫海鸥, 叶猛. 计及暂态电压质量服务的统一输电定价模型[J]. 华北电力大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 37(2): 49–53
YAN Haiou, YE Meng. Uniform transmission pricing model considering transient voltage quality service[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 37(2): 49–53
[14] 王建勋, 张逸, 张嫣, 等. 面向现代工业园区的电压暂降综合防治方案[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(14): 156–163
WANG Jianxun, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Yan, et al. Comprehensive prevention and control scheme for voltage sag in modern industrial park[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44(14): 156–163
[15] 邵冠宇, 王慧芳, 何奔腾. 电网设备缺陷文本的质量评价与提升方法[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(4): 1472–1479
SHAO Guanyu, WANG Huifang, HE Benteng. Quality assessment and improvement method for power grid equipment defect text[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(4): 1472–1479
[16] 马愿谦, 肖先勇, 汪颖, 等. 高端制造企业优质电力增溢价值及其量化方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(增刊1): 99–104
MA Yuanqian, XIAO Xianyong, WANG Ying, et al. Premium price valuation of premium power for high-end manufacturing enterprises[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(S1): 99–104
[17] 许旭锋, 黄民翔, 王婷婷, 等. 供电设备检修优化算法及其在地区电网中的应用[J]. 电网技术, 2009, 33(14): 31–35
XU Xufeng, HUANG Minxiang, WANG Tingting, et al. Optimization algorithm of power supply equipment maintenance scheduling and its application in regional power network[J]. Power System Technology, 2009, 33(14): 31–35
[18] 雷震, 郝雨辰, 朱月尧, 等. 基于主从博弈模型的电热联合市场节点能价计算方法[J]. 电力工程技术, 2021, 40(1): 50–57
LEI Zhen, HAO Yuchen, ZHU Yueyao, et al. Nodal energy price calculation based on Stackelberg game model in combined power and heat market[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2021, 40(1): 50–57
[19] 蒋贤强, 徐青山, 柳丹, 等. 含分布式电源的交直流配网双层规划研究[J]. 电力工程技术, 2018, 37(4): 27–32
JIANG Xianqiang, XU Qingshan, LIU Dan, et al. Two-layer model of AC/DC distribution network containing DGs[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2018, 37(4): 27–32
[20] 匡熠, 王秀丽, 王建学, 等. 基于stackelberg博弈的虚拟电厂能源共享机制[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(12): 4556–4564
KUANG Yi, WANG Xiuli, WANG Jianxue, et al. Virtual power plant energy sharing mechanism based on stackelberg game[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44(12): 4556–4564
[21] 杨炜晨, 苗世洪, 张世旭, 等. 交直流混合微电网群分布式自治经济控制策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(3): 857–868
YANG Weichen, MIAO Shihong, ZHANG Shixu, et al. Distributed autonomous economic control strategy for AC/DC hybrid microgrid cluster[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(3): 857–868
[22] 汪颖, 周杨, 莫文雄, 等. 设备电压暂降耐受能力测试技术分析与测试规范建议[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2020, 40(2): 196–206
WANG Ying, ZHOU Yang, MO Wenxiong, et al. Technical analysis and recommendation of test specification for equipment voltage sag tolerance test[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2020, 40(2): 196–206
[23] 汪伟, 常乾坤, 于希娟, 等. 考虑电压暂降耐受曲线不确定区域的设备故障概率评估[J]. 电力电容器与无功补偿, 2020, 41(6): 142–149
WANG Wei, CHANG Qiankun, YU Xijuan, et al. Probability assessment of equipment fault considering uncertainty region of tolerance curves for voltage sags[J]. Power Capacitor & Reactive Power Compensation, 2020, 41(6): 142–149
[24] 何英杰, 支文浩, 张义坤, 等. 典型敏感设备电压暂降耐受能力自动测试系统研究[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46(5): 1956–1964
HE Yingjie, ZHI Wenhao, ZHANG Yikun, et al. Research on automatic test system for voltage sag tolerance of typical sensitive equipment[J]. Power System Technology, 2022, 46(5): 1956–1964
[25] 李科, 何辉, 唐喆. 一种实现优质电力园区分级供电的协调控制策略[J]. 浙江电力, 2018, 37(4): 68–74
LI Ke, HE Hui, TANG Zhe. The coordinated control strategy for multiple power supply in premium power park[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2018, 37(4): 68–74