考虑多重评价指标的多时段分时电价优化模型

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201903074

中国电力 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 54-59.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201903074

• 综合能源系统关键技术专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

考虑多重评价指标的多时段分时电价优化模型

汪磊, 杨贺钧, 马英浩, 张大波

合肥工业大学电气与自动化工程学院, 安徽合肥 230009

收稿日期:2019-03-26 修回日期:2019-05-17 出版日期:2019-06-05 发布日期:2019-07-02
通讯作者: 杨贺钧(1985-),男,通信作者,博士,讲师,从事电力系统规划和可靠性、需求侧响应、风电场评估与优化,E-mail:cquyhj@126.com
作者简介:汪磊(1995-),男,硕士研究生,从事电力系统需求侧响应、电力系统规划与可靠性,E-mail:hfut_wanglei1@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（51607051）；安徽省自然科学基金资助项目（1708085ME107，1908085QE237）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目（JZ2019HGTB0077）。

Optimization Model of Multi-period Time of Use Strategy Considering Multiple Assessment Indices

WANG Lei, YANG Hejun, MA Yinghao, ZHANG Dabo

School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China

Received:2019-03-26 Revised:2019-05-17 Online:2019-06-05 Published:2019-07-02
Supported by:
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51607051), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No.1708085ME107, No.1908085QE237) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.JZ2019HGTB0077).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 分时电价策略是当前电力系统需求侧管理的主要措施之一，执行分时电价能够有效降低负荷波动，实现削峰填谷。合理开展峰谷双时段或峰平谷3时段分时电价策略的选择有利于提高电网供电可靠性和用户满意度。提出基于电价弹性矩阵的用户响应模型并定量计算用户综合满意度，根据相应模型分别求解负荷峰值、负荷峰谷差以及用户综合满意度，建立峰谷分时电价与峰平谷分时电价的多重评价指标模型，利用所提指标构造电价优化的目标函数。通过对3类用户进行仿真计算验证所提方法的正确性与有效性。

关键词: 峰谷分时电价, 峰平谷分时电价, 电价弹性矩阵, 用户满意度, 削峰填谷

Abstract: Time of use (TOU) strategy is one of the main measures of demand side management (DSM) in power system at present, which can effectively reduce load fluctuation and realize peak load shifting. Reasonable selection of peak-valley time of use or peak-flat-valley time of use strategy is conducive to improving power system reliability and customer satisfaction. Therefore, a customer response model is proposed based on price elasticity matrix to quantitatively calculate the customer comprehensive satisfaction. The peak load, peak-valley difference and comprehensive customer satisfaction are calculated respectively according to corresponding models, and a multi-index model is constructed for assessment of peak-valley or peak-flat-valley TOU price. The objective function of TOU electricity price optimization problem is established using the aforementioned indices. The correctness and effectiveness of the proposed method are verified through simulating three types of customers.

Key words: peak-valley time of use, peak-flat-valley time of use, price elasticity matrix, customer satisfaction, peak load shifting

中图分类号:

TM73

汪磊, 杨贺钧, 马英浩, 张大波. 考虑多重评价指标的多时段分时电价优化模型[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(6): 54-59.

WANG Lei, YANG Hejun, MA Yinghao, ZHANG Dabo. Optimization Model of Multi-period Time of Use Strategy Considering Multiple Assessment Indices[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52(6): 54-59.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201903074

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2019/V52/I6/54

参考文献

[1] 齐先军, 程桥, 吴红斌, 等. 激励型需求响应对配电网运行可靠性的影响[J]. 电工技术学报, 2018, 33(22):5319-5326 QI Xianjun, CHENG Qiao, WU Hongbin, et al. Impact of incentive-based demand response on operational reliability of distribution network[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33(22):5319-5326
[2] 赵洪山, 赵航宇, 侯杰群, 等. 需求响应对配电网供电可靠性影响分析[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2017, 37(1):8-14 ZHAO Hongshan, ZHAO Hangyu, HOU Jiequn, et al. Effect of demand response on supply reliability of distribution network[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2017, 37(1):8-14
[3] 田世明, 王蓓蓓, 张晶. 智能电网条件下的需求响应关键技术[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34(22):3576-3589 TIAN Shiming, WANG Beibei, ZHANG Jing. Key technologies for demand response in smart grid[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34(22):3576-3589
[4] 赵波, 包侃侃, 徐志成, 等. 考虑需求侧响应的光储并网型微电网优化配置[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(21):5465-5474 ZHAO Bo, BAO Kankan, XU Zhicheng, et al. Optimal sizing for grid-connected PV-and-storage microgrid considering demand response[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(21):5465-5474
[5] WANG Y, LI L. Time-of-use based electricity demand response for sustainable manufacturing systems[J]. Energy, 2013, 63:233-244.
[6] YANG P, TANG G, NEHORAI A. A game-theoretic approach for optimal time-of-use electricity pricing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(2):884-892.
[7] 马霖, 张世荣. 分时电价/阶梯电价下家庭并网光伏发电系统运行优化调度[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(3):819-825 MA Lin, ZHANG Shirong. Optimal operation scheduling of family grid-connected photovoltaic systems under time-of-use and ladder tariffs[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(3):819-825
[8] 刘博. 计及电动汽车充电的居民分时电价方案研究[D]. 北京:华北电力大学(北京), 2018.
[9] 李春燕, 许中, 马智远. 计及用户需求响应的分时电价优化模型[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2015, 27(3):11-16 LI Chunyan, XU Zhong, MA Zhiyuan. Optimal time-of-use electricity price model considering customer demand response[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2015, 27(3):11-16
[10] 吕孟扩. 适用于电动汽车充放电的分时电价研究[D].北京:华北电力大学(北京), 2014.
[11] 姜若愚. 基于需求响应的电动汽车充电优化策略研究[D].成都:电子科技大学, 2018.
[12] 徐永丰, 吴洁晶, 黄海涛, 等. 考虑负荷率的峰谷分时电价模型[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2015, 43(23):96-103 XU Yongfeng, WU Jiejing, HUANG Haitao. Time-of-use tariff model considering load factor[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2015, 43(23):96-103
[13] 崔金栋, 罗文达, 周念成. 基于多视角的电动汽车有序充放电定价模型与策略研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(15):4438-4450, 4644 CUI Jindong, LUO Wenda, ZHOU Niancheng. Research on pricing model and strategy of electric vehicle charging and discharging based on multi view[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(15):4438-4450, 4644
[14] 王琛. 基于多智能体仿真的居民分时电价选择策略研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2018.
[15] 康守亚, 李嘉龙, 李燕珊, 等. 考虑峰谷分时电价策略的源荷协调多目标发电调度模型[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2016, 44(11):83-89 KANG Shouya, LI Jialong, LI Yanshan, et al. Multi-objective generation scheduling model of source and load considering the strategy of TOU price[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2016, 44(11):83-89
[16] 许倩. 基于用户需求响应的分时电价优化[D].太原:山西大学, 2017.
[17] 董军, 张晓虎, 李春雪, 等. 自动需求响应背景下考虑用户满意度的分时电价最优制定策略[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2016, 36(7):67-73 DONG Jun, ZHANG Xiaohu, LI Chunxue, et al. Optimal TOU pricing strategy considering user satisfaction in automated demand response background[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2016, 36(7):67-73
[18] YANG H, WANG L, ZHANG Y, et al. Reliability evaluation of power system considering time of use electricity pricing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 34(3):1991-2002.
[19] 孔强, 付强, 林亭君, 等. 基于成本效益分析的峰谷分时电价优化模型[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2018, 46(15):60-67 KONG Qiang, FU Qiang, LIN Tingjun, et al. Optimal peak-valley time-of-use power price model based on cost-benefit analysis[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2018, 46(15):60-67
[20] 李沐珂. 计及分布式光伏发电的分时电价优化研究[D].西安:西安理工大学, 2018.
[21] JARDINI J, TAHAN C, GOUVEA M, et al. Daily load profiles for residential, commercial and industrial low voltage consumers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2000, 15(1):375-380.

考虑多重评价指标的多时段分时电价优化模型

Optimization Model of Multi-period Time of Use Strategy Considering Multiple Assessment Indices

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	吴桐, 惠红勋, 张洪财. 商业建筑空调系统参与城市电网负荷调控综述[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(7): 1-11.
[2]	王艳茹, 尹喜阳, 欧清海, 马文洁, 刘卉, 杜治钢. 基于能量共享与交易协同的5G融合配电网基站储能调控方法[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(6): 61-70.
[3]	曾爽, 梁安琪, 王立永, 李香龙, 马麟, 王喆, 王林钰, 刘澜, 赵伟. 考虑光储型电热协同系统灵活性的多代理削峰填谷策略[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(2): 133-142.
[4]	蒋怡静, 于艾清, 黄敏丽. 考虑用户满意度的电动汽车时空双尺度有序充电引导策略[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(4): 122-130.
[5]	于会群, 尹申, 张浩, 时珊珊, 彭道刚, 蔡国顺. 考虑电动汽车用户满意度的微网分层优化调度策略[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(12): 83-91.
[6]	易越, 袁志昌, 郑浩, 史梓男, 马唯婧. 多时间尺度的直流配电网运行优化[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(10): 64-71.
[7]	李娜, 张文月, 王玉玮, 符景帅, 王炜劼, 王麟. 基于数据均值化及LSSVM算法的峰谷电价需求响应模型[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(9): 137-141.
[8]	赵胤慧, 鞠立伟, 许长青, 陈致宏, 谭忠富. 基于峰谷分时电价的风火电节能调度优化模型[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(2): 32-36.
[9]	施泉生, 刘晔, 孙波. 上海地区发展电动汽车的综合效益分析[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(11): 121-126.
[10]	韩花荣, 张晶, 徐婧劼, 范镇南. 基于改进细菌群体趋药性算法的风-蓄-火联合调度[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(11): 95-100.
[11]	靳文涛, 李建林. 电池储能系统用于风电功率部分“削峰填谷”控制及容量配置[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(8): 16-21.
[12]	黄秀琼，鲁籍元，牛焕娜，费标青. 用于主网削峰填谷调度的风/光/储微电网控制策略[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(2): 87-92.

模态框（Modal）标题

考虑多重评价指标的多时段分时电价优化模型

Optimization Model of Multi-period Time of Use Strategy Considering Multiple Assessment Indices

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics