中国电力 ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (8): 176-184.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202410090
冯小萍1(), 陈启迪1(
), 赵青春2(
), 王兴1, 李斌1, 谢华2
收稿日期:
2024-10-28
发布日期:
2025-08-26
出版日期:
2025-08-28
作者简介:
基金资助:
FENG Xiaoping1(), CHEN Qidi1(
), ZHAO Qingchun2(
), WANG Xing1, LI Bin1, XIE Hua2
Received:
2024-10-28
Online:
2025-08-26
Published:
2025-08-28
Supported by:
摘要:
双碳目标下新能源大量接入电网,继电保护作为电力系统安全稳定运行首要保障措施越发重要。构网型变流器技术研究多集中于系统稳定控制、故障穿越等方面,对于继电保护的特性研究则鲜有涉及。对构网型储能变流器控制策略下输电线路保护适应性展开分析。首先,分析构网型变流器的同步控制策略和故障穿越控制策略,同时对不同故障穿越控制策略下的构网型变流的故障电路进行等效;其次,针对常见保护配置开展构网控制策略下的动作性能评估,并对各种保护配置进行适应性分析;最后,在Simulink中搭建含构网型储能变流器的输电线路模型,对相关理论进行验证,并根据输电线路保护适应性,给出了相应的改进建议。
中图分类号:
冯小萍, 陈启迪, 赵青春, 王兴, 李斌, 谢华. 构网型储能变流器控制策略下输电线路保护适应性分析[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(8): 176-184.
FENG Xiaoping, CHEN Qidi, ZHAO Qingchun, WANG Xing, LI Bin, XIE Hua. Adaptability Analysis of Transmission Line Protection under the Control Strategy of Grid-Forming Energy Storage Converter[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58(8): 176-184.
故障位置 | 过渡电 阻/Ω | 动作情况 | ||||||||
AG | BC | BCG | ABC | |||||||
区内故障( | 0 | 动作 | 动作 | 动作 | 动作 | |||||
60 | 动作 | 动作 | 动作 | 动作 | ||||||
110 | 动作 | 动作 | 动作 | 动作 | ||||||
区外故障( | 0 | 不动作 | 不动作 | 不动作 | 不动作 | |||||
60 | 不动作 | 不动作 | 不动作 | 不动作 | ||||||
110 | 不动作 | 不动作 | 不动作 | 不动作 |
表 1 输电线路电流差动保护动作情况
Table 1 Operation of Current Differential Protection for Transmission Lines
故障位置 | 过渡电 阻/Ω | 动作情况 | ||||||||
AG | BC | BCG | ABC | |||||||
区内故障( | 0 | 动作 | 动作 | 动作 | 动作 | |||||
60 | 动作 | 动作 | 动作 | 动作 | ||||||
110 | 动作 | 动作 | 动作 | 动作 | ||||||
区外故障( | 0 | 不动作 | 不动作 | 不动作 | 不动作 | |||||
60 | 不动作 | 不动作 | 不动作 | 不动作 | ||||||
110 | 不动作 | 不动作 | 不动作 | 不动作 |
过渡 电阻/Ω | 故障 类型 | 测量阻抗 相角/(°) | 测量阻抗 幅值/Ω | 动作 情况 | ||||
0.3 | AG | 58.400 | 5.934 | 不动作 | ||||
BC | 79.450 | 1.659 | 误动 | |||||
BCG | 62.970 | 8.054 | 不动作 | |||||
ABC | 89.590 | 4.015 | 误动 | |||||
6.0 | AG | –0.419 | 31.145 | 不动作 | ||||
BC | –89.640 | 65.897 | 不动作 | |||||
BCG | 46.370 | 30.195 | 不动作 | |||||
ABC | –52.430 | 50.124 | 不动作 |
表 2 区外故障时构网变流侧距离Ⅰ段动作情况
Table 2 The action of distance segment I on the converter side of the network during faults outside the area
过渡 电阻/Ω | 故障 类型 | 测量阻抗 相角/(°) | 测量阻抗 幅值/Ω | 动作 情况 | ||||
0.3 | AG | 58.400 | 5.934 | 不动作 | ||||
BC | 79.450 | 1.659 | 误动 | |||||
BCG | 62.970 | 8.054 | 不动作 | |||||
ABC | 89.590 | 4.015 | 误动 | |||||
6.0 | AG | –0.419 | 31.145 | 不动作 | ||||
BC | –89.640 | 65.897 | 不动作 | |||||
BCG | 46.370 | 30.195 | 不动作 | |||||
ABC | –52.430 | 50.124 | 不动作 |
过渡 电阻/Ω | 故障 类型 | 测量阻抗 相角/(°) | 测量阻抗 幅值/Ω | 动作 情况 | ||||
0 | AG | 65.9 | 2.854 | 动作 | ||||
BC | 71.1 | 3.204 | 动作 | |||||
BCG | 72.1 | 3.127 | 动作 | |||||
ABC | 71.5 | 3.054 | 动作 | |||||
0.6 | AG | 47.7 | 3.704 | 动作 | ||||
BC | –23.1 | 5.457 | 不动作 | |||||
BCG | 60.0 | 4.397 | 动作 | |||||
ABC | –27.8 | 4.518 | 不动作 | |||||
6.0 | AG | 10.0 | 13.947 | 不动作 | ||||
BC | –24.7 | 51.347 | 不动作 | |||||
BCG | 57.1 | 16.143 | 不动作 | |||||
ABC | 59.4 | 36.174 | 不动作 |
表 3 区内故障时构网变流侧距离Ⅰ段动作情况
Table 3 The action of distance segment I on the converter side of the network during faults inside the area
过渡 电阻/Ω | 故障 类型 | 测量阻抗 相角/(°) | 测量阻抗 幅值/Ω | 动作 情况 | ||||
0 | AG | 65.9 | 2.854 | 动作 | ||||
BC | 71.1 | 3.204 | 动作 | |||||
BCG | 72.1 | 3.127 | 动作 | |||||
ABC | 71.5 | 3.054 | 动作 | |||||
0.6 | AG | 47.7 | 3.704 | 动作 | ||||
BC | –23.1 | 5.457 | 不动作 | |||||
BCG | 60.0 | 4.397 | 动作 | |||||
ABC | –27.8 | 4.518 | 不动作 | |||||
6.0 | AG | 10.0 | 13.947 | 不动作 | ||||
BC | –24.7 | 51.347 | 不动作 | |||||
BCG | 57.1 | 16.143 | 不动作 | |||||
ABC | 59.4 | 36.174 | 不动作 |
图 8 流向构网变流侧的零序电流与故障距离的关系
Fig.8 The relationship between the zero-sequence current flowing towards the grid-forming converter side and the fault distance
故障类型 | 构网变流侧 | 主网侧 | ||
AG | AG/ABG | AG | ||
BG | BG/BCG | BG | ||
CG | CG/CAG | CG | ||
AB | AG | AB | ||
BC | BC | BC | ||
AC | AC | AC | ||
ABG | ABG | ABG | ||
BCG | BCG | BCG | ||
CAG | CAG | CAG | ||
ABC | ABC | ABC |
表 4 不同故障下两侧选相元件的判别结果
Table 4 The discrimination results of phase selection elements on both sides under different fault conditions
故障类型 | 构网变流侧 | 主网侧 | ||
AG | AG/ABG | AG | ||
BG | BG/BCG | BG | ||
CG | CG/CAG | CG | ||
AB | AG | AB | ||
BC | BC | BC | ||
AC | AC | AC | ||
ABG | ABG | ABG | ||
BCG | BCG | BCG | ||
CAG | CAG | CAG | ||
ABC | ABC | ABC |
1 |
但扬清, 王蕾, 郑伟民, 等. 高比例可再生能源接入背景下电网承载能力鲁棒提升策略[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56 (9): 104- 111.
DOI |
DAN Yangqing, WANG Lei, ZHENG Weimin, et al. Robust improvement strategy for power grid hosting capacity with integration of high proportion of renewable energy[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56 (9): 104- 111.
DOI |
|
2 |
周洋, 黄德志, 李培栋, 等. 考虑平衡端点相位不对称及光伏接入的低压配电网三相潮流模型[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (10): 190- 198.
DOI |
ZHOU Yang, HUANG Dezhi, LI Peidong, et al. A three-phase power flow model for low-voltage distribution networks considering balanced bus phase asymmetry and photovoltaic access[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (10): 190- 198.
DOI |
|
3 | 石梦舒, 宋志成, 黄元生. 考虑绿氢制取和碳捕捉的电转气综合效益评价[J]. 南方能源建设, 2023, 10 (3): 74- 88. |
SHI Mengshu, SONG Zhicheng, HUANG Yuansheng. Comprehensive benefit evaluation of power to gas conversion considering green hydrogen production and carbon capture[J]. Southern Energy Construction, 2023, 10 (3): 74- 88. | |
4 |
张心怡, 杨波. 考虑构网型和跟网型变流器的孤岛微电网小信号稳定性分析[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2024, 46 (2): 12- 18.
DOI |
ZHANG Xinyi, YANG Bo. Stability analysis on islanded microgrids with grid-forming and grid-following converters[J]. Integrated Intelligent Energy, 2024, 46 (2): 12- 18.
DOI |
|
5 | 谢俊, 李智, 曾垂辉, 等. 构网型逆变器同步频率谐振抑制研究[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2024, 44 (4): 28- 37. |
XIE Jun, LI Zhi, ZENG Chuihui, et al. Synchronization frequency resonance suppression in grid-formed inverters[J]. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2024, 44 (4): 28- 37. | |
6 | 项中明, 倪秋龙, 李振华, 等. 采用功率同步控制的构网型换流器并网暂态同步稳定研究[J]. 浙江电力, 2023, 42 (9): 77- 88. |
XIANG Zhongming, NI Qiulong, LI Zhenhua, et al. Research on transient synchronous stability of integrated grid-forming converters using power synchronization control[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2023, 42 (9): 77- 88. | |
7 | 徐政. 新型电力系统背景下电网强度的合理定义及其计算方法[J]. 高电压技术, 2022, 48 (10): 3805- 3819. |
XU Zheng. Reasonable definition and calculation method of power grid strength under the background of new type power systems[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2022, 48 (10): 3805- 3819. | |
8 | 但扬清, 黄莹, 韩连山, 等. 计及功率控制型构网变流器接入的交流系统暂态稳定性仿真研究[J]. 浙江电力, 2024, 43 (6): 1- 12. |
DAN Yangqing, HUANG Ying, HAN Lianshan, et al. Simulation study on transient stability of AC systems considering the connected power-controlled grid-forming converters[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2024, 43 (6): 1- 12. | |
9 |
段玉, 朱子民, 王小云, 等. 基于改进粒子群算法的自适应构网型变流器控制策略[J]. 广东电力, 2024, 37 (2): 10- 17.
DOI |
DUAN Yu, ZHU Zimin, WANG Xiaoyun, et al. Adaptive grid-type converter control strategy based on improved particle swarm algorithm[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2024, 37 (2): 10- 17.
DOI |
|
10 | 王龙悦, 胡鹏飞, 于彦雪, 等. 基于混合同步控制的构网型变流器不对称故障下暂态稳定分析[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2025, 49 (2): 20- 29. |
WANG Longyue, HU Pengfei, YU Yanxue, et al. Transient stability analysis of hybrid-synchronization control based grid-forming converters under asymmetric faults[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2025, 49 (2): 20- 29. | |
11 | 彭放, 高厚磊, 郭一飞, 等. 构网逆变电源故障穿越控制策略及其对保护影响的研究综述[J]. 电网技术, 2024, 48 (9): 3673- 3685. |
PENG Fang, GAO Houlei, GUO Yifei, et al. A review of fault ride-through control strategies of grid-forming inverter-based resources and the influence on protection[J]. Power System Technology, 2024, 48 (9): 3673- 3685. | |
12 |
刘雨姗, 陈俊儒, 常喜强, 等. 构网型储能变流器并网性能的多层级评价指标体系及应用[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58 (3): 193- 203.
DOI |
LIU Yushan, CHEN Junru, CHANG Xiqiang, et al. Multi-level evaluation index system and application of grid-connected performance of grid-forming energy storage converters[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58 (3): 193- 203.
DOI |
|
13 | 温春雪, 毛健, 王鹏, 等. 基于虚拟同步发电机的构网型光储变流器控制策略研究[J]. 内蒙古电力技术, 2024, 42 (1): 1- 8. |
WEN Chunxue, MAO Jian, WANG Peng, et al. Research on control strategy of grid-configured photovoltaic storage converters based on VSG[J]. Inner Mongolia Electric Power, 2024, 42 (1): 1- 8. | |
14 |
李亚楼, 赵飞, 樊雪君. 构网型储能及其应用综述[J]. 发电技术, 2025, 46 (2): 386- 398.
DOI |
LI Yalou, ZHAO Fei, FAN Xuejun. Review of grid-forming energy storage and its applications[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46 (2): 386- 398.
DOI |
|
15 |
郑天文, 陈来军, 陈天一, 等. 虚拟同步发电机技术及展望[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2015, 39 (21): 165- 175.
DOI |
ZHENG Tianwen, CHEN Laijun, CHEN Tianyi, et al. Review and prospect of virtual synchronous generator technologies[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2015, 39 (21): 165- 175.
DOI |
|
16 | 杜夏恒, 赫玉莹, 邹文, 等. 跟网型和构网型逆变器的阻抗无源化方法综述[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2024, 44 (2): 12- 20. |
DU Xiaheng, HE Yuying, ZOU Wen, et al. An overview of impedance passivation methods forGrid-following and grid-forming inverters[J]. Journal of Northeast Electric Power University, 2024, 44 (2): 12- 20. | |
17 |
马秀达, 卢宇, 田杰, 等. 柔性直流输电系统的构网型控制关键技术与挑战[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2023, 47 (3): 1- 11.
DOI |
MA Xiuda, LU Yu, TIAN Jie, et al. Key technologies and challenges of grid-forming control for flexible DC transmission system[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2023, 47 (3): 1- 11.
DOI |
|
18 | LIN X C, ZHENG Y, LIANG Z G, et al. The suppression of voltage overshoot and oscillation during the fast recovery process from load short-circuit fault for three-phase stand-alone inverter[J]. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 2020, 9 (1): 858- 871. |
19 |
LI Z L, CHAN K W, HU J F, et al. An adaptive fault ride-through scheme for grid-forming inverters under asymmetrical grid faults[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2022, 69 (12): 12912- 12923.
DOI |
20 | WU H, WANG X F. Small-signal modeling and controller parameters tuning of grid-forming VSCs with adaptive virtual impedance-based current limitation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2021, 37 (6): 7185- 7199. |
[1] | 陈瑞, 郑涛, 任翔, 沈文韬, 张璐, 强雨泽, 刘博, 王瑜璇. 电化学储能系统接入条件下正序故障分量方向元件适应性分析[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(8): 84-93, 138. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||