基于三标度-理想解法的发电计划评估

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201705048

中国电力 ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (11): 108-115.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201705048

基于三标度-理想解法的发电计划评估

赵洪磊¹, 项添春¹, 张新伦², 么莉², 林济铿³, 戴赛⁴, 王旭东¹

1. 国网天津市电力公司,天津 300010;
2. 智能电网教育部重点实验室（天津大学）,天津 300072;
3. 同济大学电子与信息工程学院电力系,上海 201804;
4. 中国电力科学研究院,北京 100192

收稿日期:2017-05-04 出版日期:2017-11-25 发布日期:2017-11-29
作者简介:赵洪磊（1965—）,男,北京人,高级工程师,从事配电网优化运行与控制、城市能源互联网规划与发展模式研究。E-mail: yuancao@bupt.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家电网公司科技项目“总部分部一体化日前发电计划关键技术研究与应用”

Generation Scheduling Evaluation Based on Three-Demarcation and TOPSIS Method

ZHAO Honglei¹, XIAN Tianchun¹, ZHANG Xinlun², YAO Li², LIN Jikeng³, DAI Sai⁴, WANG Xudong¹

1. State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Company, Tianjin 300010, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Smart Grid (Tianjin University), Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300072, China;
3. Department of Electrical Power Engineering of Electronic and Information Engineering School of Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China;
4. China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100192, China

Received:2017-05-04 Online:2017-11-25 Published:2017-11-29
Supported by:
This work is supported by Science and Technology Projects of SGCC of research and application of key technologies in power generation plan for the integration of headquarters division.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 实现对发电计划方案的全面评估,对于发电计划的选择具有重要意义。首先完整的发电计划评估指标体系基础上,将三标度法与理想解法相结合。求取权重过程中采用迭代的思想,既保证了计算精度,又避免了传统赋权过程中一致性校验不易通过的问题;然后采用理想解法进行方案评估,通过计算待评估方案的各指标数值与指标的正负理想解的欧拉距离对本方案进行打分,实现了对发电计划的评估。最后通过电网实际数据验证了本文所提方法的有效性。

关键词: 发电计划评估, 指标体系, 三标度法, 理想解法

Abstract: Achieving a comprehensive assessment of the power generation scheduling is important for choosing power generation plans. Firstly, a complete set of indicator system is established. Then, by combining with TOPSIS method, the three-demarcation method is used to calculate the indicator weight with the idea of iteration, which can not only ensure the accuracy of calculation, but also avoid the difficulty of consistency check in the process of traditional weighting. Then the TOPSIS method is used to evaluate the scheme, in which the indicators of the scheme and the Euler distance between the positive and negative ideal solutions are used to grading the scheme, subsequently realizing the evaluation of the power generation scheduling. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by the data of actual power grid.

Key words: generation scheduling evaluation, indicator system, three-demarcation method, TOPSIS method

中图分类号:

TM732

赵洪磊, 项添春, 张新伦, 么莉, 林济铿, 戴赛, 王旭东. 基于三标度-理想解法的发电计划评估[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(11): 108-115.

ZHAO Honglei, XIAN Tianchun, ZHANG Xinlun, YAO Li, LIN Jikeng, DAI Sai, WANG Xudong. Generation Scheduling Evaluation Based on Three-Demarcation and TOPSIS Method[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(11): 108-115.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201705048

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V50/I11/108

参考文献

[1] 王楠,张粒子,王军,等. 跨省跨区交易穿越线损补偿方法[J]. 电网技术,2011,35（12）：171-176.
WANG Nan, ZHANG Lizi, WANG Jun, et al . A Wheeling loss compensation method for trans-provincial regional electricity transaction [J]. Power System Technology, 2011, 35(12): 171-176.
[2] 骆晓明,马煜华,陈亮. 广东省节能发电调度的社会效益评估新方法[J]. 中国电力,2010,43（9）：1-5.
LUO Xiaoming, MA Yuhua, CHEN Liang. Social benefit evaluating method of energy-conservation based generation dispatching in Guangdong Province [J]. Electric Power, 2010, 43(9): 1-5 .
[3] 张巍峰,车延博,林济铿,等. 基于改进抽样法的电力系统可靠性评估[J]. 中国电力,2015,48（5）：56-63.
ZHANG Weifeng, CHE Yanbo, LIN Jikeng, et al . Power system reliability evaluation based on improved sampling method [J]. Electric Power, 2015,48（5）：56-63.
[4] 董雷,赵灿,陈乃仕,等. 配电系统短期可靠性评估方案[J]. 中国电力,2016,49（12）：15-20.
DONG Lei, ZHAO Can, CHEN Naishi, et al . Short-term reliability assessment scheme for distribution system [J]. Electric Power, 2016, 249(12): 15-20.
[5] 白恺,宋鹏,刁嘉,等. 基于可靠性和发电性能的新能源发电设备状态评估方法[J]. 中国电力,2016,49（7）：140-144.
BAI Kai, SONG Peng, DIAO Jia, et al . Condition assessment method of renewable energy generation equipment based on reliability and generation performance indicators[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(7): 140-144.
[6] BILLINTON R, ALLAN R N, ALLAN R N. Reliability evaluation of power systems [M]. New York: Plenum press, 1984.
[7] Task force on probabilistic aspects of reliability criteria of the IEEE PES reliability, risk and probability applications subcommittee. probabilistic security assessment for power system operations [C]. Proceeding of IEEE PES General Meeting. Denver: IEEE, 2004: 212-220.
[8] ZHANG J, PU J, MCCALLEY J D, et al . A Bayesian approach for short-term transmission line thermal overloads risk assessment [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2002, 17(3): 770-778.
[9] CHIANG H D, JEAN-JUMEAU R. Toward a practical performance index for predicting voltage collapse in electric power systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1995, 10(2): 584-592.
[10] 陈启鑫,周天睿,康重庆,等. 节能发电调度的低碳化效益评估模型及其应用[J]. 电力系统自动化,2009（16）：24-29.
CHEN Qixin, ZHOU Tianrui, KANG Chongqing, et al . An assessment model of low-carbon effect and its application to energy saving based[J]. Automation of Electric Power System, 2009(16): 24-29.
[11] 黎灿兵,刘玙,曹一家,等. 低碳发电调度与节能发电调度的一致性评估[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2011,31（31）：94-101.
LI Canbing, LIU Yu, CAO Yijia, et al . Consistency evaluation of low-carbon generation sispatching and energy-saving generation dispatching [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2011, 31(31): 94-101.
[12] ALLAN R N, BILLINTON R, BREIPOHL A M, et al . Bibliography on the application of probability methods in power system reliability evaluation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(1): 51-57.
[13] 常建娥,蒋太立. 层次分析法确定权重的研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报（信息与管理工程版）,2007,29（1）：153-156.
CHANG Jian'e, JIANG Taili. Research on the weight of coefficient through analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of wut (information & management eng ineering), 2007, 29(1): 153-156.
[14] 李永,胡向红,乔箭. 改进的模糊层次分析法[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版）,2005,35（1）：11-12.
LI Yong, HU Xianghong, QIAO Jian. An improved fuzzy AHP method[J]. Journal of Northwest University（Natural Science Edition）, 2005, 35(1): 11-12.
[15] 林济铿,李童飞,赵子明,等. 基于熵权模糊综合评价模型的电力系统黑启动方案评估[J]. 电网技术,2012,36（2）：115-120.
LIN Jikeng, LI Tongfei, ZHAO Ziming, et al . Assessment on power system black-start schemes based on entropy-weighted fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model[J]. Power System Technology, 2012, 36(2): 115-120.
[16] 于亮,方志耕,吴利丰,等. 基于灰色类别差异特性的评价指标客观权重极大熵配置模型[J]. 系统工程理论实践,2014,34(8): 2065-2070.
YU Liang, FANG Zhigeng, WU Lifeng, et al . Maximum entropy configuration model of objective index weight based on grey category characteristics difference[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2014, 34(8): 2065-2070.
[17] 李彦斌,于心怡,王致杰. 采用灰色关联度与 TOPSIS 法的光伏发电项目风险评价研究[J]. 电网技术,2013,37（6）：1514-1519.
LI Yanbin, YU Xinyi, WANG Zhijie. Risk assessment on photovoltaic power generation project by grey correlation analysis and TOPSIS method[J]. Power System Technology, 2013, 37(6): 1514-1519.
[18] 付学谦,陈皓勇. 基于理想解法的电能质量综合评估[J]. 电力自动化设备,2014,34（4）：26-30.
FU Xueqian, CHEN Haoyon. Comprehensive power quality evaluation based on TOPSIS approach[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2014, 34(4): 26-30.
[19] 杨家豪,欧阳森,石怡理,等. 一种组合隶属度函数及其在电能质量模糊评价中的应用[J]. 电工电能新技术,2014,33（2）: 63-69.
YANG Jiahao, OUYANG Sen, SHI Yi, et al . Combined membership function and its application on fuzzy evaluation of power quality[J]. Advanced Technology of Electrical Engineering and Energy, 2014, 33(2): 63-69.
[20] 郭凯,李祥松,冯霏,等. 改进的模糊层次分析法在综合设计法中的应用[J]. 机械与电子,2009,9(5): 3-5.
GUO Kai, LI Xiangsong, FENG Fei, et al . Application of an improved fuzzy AHP method in the synthesis design[J]. Machinery & Electronic, 2009, 9(5): 3-5.

基于三标度-理想解法的发电计划评估

Generation Scheduling Evaluation Based on Three-Demarcation and TOPSIS Method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘雨姗, 陈俊儒, 常喜强, 刘牧阳. 构网型储能变流器并网性能的多层级评价指标体系及应用[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(3): 193-203.
[2]	杨珂, 王栋, 李达, 张王俊, 向尕, 李军. 虚拟电厂网络安全风险评估指标体系构建及量化计算[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(8): 130-137.
[3]	乔俊峰, 周爱华, 彭林, 王一清, 沈晓峰, 潘森, 杨佩, 黄晨宏. 基于多源数据深度融合的配电网运行评价方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(6): 193-203.
[4]	吴庆, 王云棣, 曾令康, 孙云晓, 陈闽林. 基于层次分析法的“十四五”终端通信接入网通信技术规划[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(5): 174-181.
[5]	赵洪山, 李静璇. 基于PSR和改进灰色TOPSIS的园区客户能效评估模型[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(3): 203-212.
[6]	程智余, 朱晓虎, 李建青. 基于改进ELECTRE法的电网规划投资多准则融合决策方法[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 59-65.
[7]	沈岩, 李东东, 林顺富. 碳中和背景下的工业用户综合用能指标体系多维画像方法[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55(11): 91-96.
[8]	赵璞, 周满, 高建宇, 潘乐真, 刘自发, 谢浩铠. 基于电能替代的园区综合能源规划评价方法[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(4): 130-140.
[9]	林正冲, 戚思睿, 苟吉伟, 徐特, 刘雪飞, 倪萌, 王蓓蓓. 新电改形势下集中化大型数据中心战略投资和商业模式[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(11): 37-46.
[10]	秦子健, 石季英, 魏文辉, 林济铿, 张新伦, 武琳. 中低压配电网综合效益评估方法研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(8): 34-44.
[11]	肖帅, 张岩, 章德, 禹海峰, 李梦骄. 风电群输电规划评价指标体系和方法[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(10): 115-122.
[12]	马君华, 陆一鸣, 袁文广, 王磊, 黄文瑞, 延星. 能源互联网评价体系研究[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(8): 38-42.
[13]	严宇, 林济铿, 侯验秋. 电力市场适应性评估框架体系构建[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(12): 149-157.
[14]	范君军, 陈智超, 陈涛, 董建达, 邬宏伟. 电网应急演练评估及其指标体系[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(11): 116-120.
[15]	谢迎军, 王玉亭, 李炜, 丁慧霞, 王智慧, 张世先, 周阮坤. 电力企业通信网运行质量评估指标体系[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(10): 22-27.

模态框（Modal）标题

基于三标度-理想解法的发电计划评估

Generation Scheduling Evaluation Based on Three-Demarcation and TOPSIS Method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics