中国电力 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (12): 92-100,109.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202002091

• 城镇地区分布式多能互补能源系统关键技术专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

典型区县综合能源服务实施路径比较分析

孙强1, 陈倩1, 潘杭萍1, 雍维桢2, 陈洋2, 王建学2   

  1. 1. 国网(苏州)城市能源研究院,江苏 苏州 215004;
    2. 西安交通大学 电气工程学院,陕西 西安 710049
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-18 修回日期:2020-09-02 发布日期:2020-12-16
  • 作者简介:孙强(1977—),男,博士,高级工程师,从事综合能源系统规划、智能电网及配电网规划和评估研究,E-mail:sunqiang@sgeri.sgcc.com.cn;陈倩(1992—),女,硕士,工程师,从事综合能源服务、配电网规划、智慧能源系统研究,E-mail:chen61011104@163.com;潘杭萍(1994—),女,硕士,工程师,从事城市能源互联网、热网规划、本地资源禀赋评估预测研究,E-mail:pan_hangping@163.com;雍维桢(1996—),男,博士研究生,从事能源互联网规划、运行与交易方面研究,E-mail:yongweizhen@foxmail.com;陈洋(1994—),男,博士研究生,从事综合能源系统运行与交易方面研究,E-mail:youngchen1994@stu.xjtu.edu.cn;王建学(1976—),男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为电力市场,电力系统规划与运行等,E-mail:jxwang@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

Comparative Analysis of Integrated Energy Service Implementation Paths in Typical Districts and Counties

SUN Qiang1, CHEN Qian1, PAN Hangping1, YONG Weizhen2, CHEN Yang2, WANG Jianxue2   

  1. 1. State Grid (Suzhou) City & Energy Research Institute, Suzhou 215004, China;
    2. School of Electrical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
  • Received:2020-02-18 Revised:2020-09-02 Published:2020-12-16

摘要: 能源环境问题的凸显、用户用能需求的变化以及“互联网+”、储能等关键技术的突破,极大地推动了综合能源服务的发展。目前,鲜有针对区县级综合能源服务实施路径的研究。提出一种基于TOPSIS模型的区县分类方法,形成6类典型区县,针对每一类型区县制定开展综合能源服务的实施路径。以江苏省96区县作为研究对象,并选取宝应县、江阴市、扬中市、玄武区、吴中区、铜山区6个区县作为代表区县进行实例分析,结果表明∶该方法具有通用性,对不同类型区县开展综合能源服务业务具有指导意义。

关键词: 区县级综合能源服务, 实施路径, 农业特色型, 耗能工业型, 低碳产业型, 商业服务型, 休闲宜居型, 一般综合型

Abstract: In recent years, integrated energy services have been greatly improved as the result of the prominence of energy and environmental problems, changes in user energy demand, and breakthroughs in key technologies such as "Internet plus" and energy storage. Quite a few works can be found on integrated energy systems and integrated energy services. However, little of them has focused on the district-level. In this paper, a typical district classification method based on TOPSIS model was proposed, which divided districts and counties into six types. According to the characteristics of districts and counties types, implementation routes of integrated energy services were planned. The proposed methods were applied in the case studies of several typical counties, including Baoying, Jiangyin, Yangzhong, Xuanwu, Wuzhong and Tongshan.

Key words: district-level integrated energy service, implementation path, agricultural type, energy-consuming industrial type, low-carbon industrial type, commercial service type, leisure and livable type, common type