预热和焊后热处理对T23钢接头力学性能的影响

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.02.001.05

中国电力 ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 1-5.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.02.001.05

预热和焊后热处理对T23钢接头力学性能的影响

李夕强¹，王学²，杨超¹，葛兆祥¹，杨贤彪¹，任遥遥²

1.江苏方天电力技术有限公司，江苏南京 211102;
2.武汉大学动力与机械学院，湖北武汉 430072

收稿日期:2015-10-08 出版日期:2016-02-18 发布日期:2016-03-21
作者简介:李夕强（1973-），男，江苏南京人，高级工程师，从事电站金属监督、理化分析及无损评估方面的研究。E-mail: lee0178@sina.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（51574181）；先进焊接与连接国家重点实验室开放课题重点资助项目（AWJ-Z15-02）

Effects of Preheating and Post-Weld Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of T23 Steel Weldment

LI Xiqiang¹, WANG Xue², YANG Chao¹, GE Zhaoxiang¹, YANG Xianbiao¹, REN Yaoyao²

1. Jiangsu Frontier Electric Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 211102, China;
2. School of Power and Mechanics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

Received:2015-10-08 Online:2016-02-18 Published:2016-03-21
Supported by:
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 51574181) and State Key Lab of Advanced Welding and Joining, Harbin Institute of Technology (No. AWJ-Z15-02).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为优化焊接工艺，解决水冷壁T23接头焊缝在运行中容易出现裂纹的问题，测试了T23接头在4种不同工艺（不预热、焊后不热处理，不预热、焊后热处理，预热、焊后不热处理，预热、焊后热处理；预热温度为150 ℃，焊后热处理工艺为740 ℃、0.5 h）下的硬度和冲击韧性，并观察了显微组织的变化。研究结果表明，预热对T23接头硬度的影响不大，但增大晶粒尺寸和过热区的宽度，对焊缝和热影响区（HAZ）的韧性均有不利影响；焊后热处理明显降低焊缝和HAZ的硬度，虽然对HAZ韧性影响很小，但可改善焊缝的韧性。建议预热温度不超过150 ℃或取消预热，进行焊后热处理以保证接头的长期服役性能。

关键词: T23钢, 焊接接头, 预热, 焊后热处理, 力学性能

Abstract: In order to optimize the welding techniques of T23 steel and avoid the cracking in its welded joints in the water-wall of ultra supercritical(USC) boilers, the hardness and toughness are tested for the joints welded with four different welding techniques, which are the ones of without preheating and post-weld heat treatment(PWHT), PWHT without preheating, preheating without PWHT, preheating and PWHT. The preheating is set at 150 ℃ and PWHT being at 740 ℃ for 0.5 h. The changes of their microstructures are also observed. The results show that preheating has little effect on the hardness of the weldments, but it makes the grain size and width of the over-heated zone enlarge, which lowers the toughness of the weld metal and the heat-affected zone (HAZ). PWHT significantly reduces the hardness of the weld metal and HAZ, and improves the toughness of the weld metal even though it has little effect on that of HAZ. In order to avoid the occuring of cold cracking, preheating with the temperatures below 150 ℃ or no prheating is recommended for the welding of T23 steel. For the sake of long-term operating properities of the T23 steel joints, PWHT is still necessary for the improvement.

Key words: T23 steel, welded joint, preheating, post-weld heat treatment, mechanical properties

中图分类号:

TG142
TM621

李夕强，王学，杨超，葛兆祥，杨贤彪，任遥遥. 预热和焊后热处理对T23钢接头力学性能的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(2): 1-5.

LI Xiqiang, WANG Xue, YANG Chao, GE Zhaoxiang, YANG Xianbiao, REN Yaoyao. Effects of Preheating and Post-Weld Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of T23 Steel Weldment[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(2): 1-5.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.2016.02.001.05

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2016/V49/I2/1

参考文献

[1] 赵钦新，朱丽慧．超临界锅炉耐热钢研究[M]．北京：机械工业出版社，2010：111-123．
[2] BENDICK W, GABREL J, HAHN B, et al． New low alloy heat resistant ferritic steels T/P23 and T/P24 for power plant application[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2007, 84: 13-20．
[3] IGARASHI M, YOSHIZAWA M, MATSUO H, et al． Long-trerm creep properties of low C-2.25Cr-1.6W-VNb steel （T23/P23） for fossil fired and heat recovery boilers[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2009, 510-511: 104-109．
[4] 杨富，章应霖，任永宁，等．新型耐热钢焊接[M]．北京：中国电力出版社，2006：79-86．
[5] VAILLANT J C, VANDENBERGHE B, HANHN B, et al． T/P23, 24, 911 and 92: new grades for advanced coal-fired power plants-Properties and experience[J]． International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2008, 85(12): 38-46．
[6] DHOOGE A, VEKEMAN J． New generation 2.25Cr steels T/P23 and T/P24 weld ability and high temperature properties [J]．Welding in the World, 2005, 49(9/10): 31-49．
[7] 季献武，段鹏，李驹，等． T23钢在超超临界1 000 MW机组的应用及现状[J]．华东电力，２００９，３７（１２）：２０９７－２１００．
JI Xianwu, DUAN Peng, LI Ju, et al． Application of T23 steel to 1 000 MW ultra-supercritical units [J]． East China Electric Power, 2009, 37(12): 2097-2100．
[8] 王昌文，何鹏． 1 000 MW超超临界锅炉水冷壁T23管泄露分析及处理[J]．上海电力学院学报，２０１４，３０（４）：３３９－３４５．
WANG Changwen, HE Peng． Analysis of the leakage of T23 water wall tube of 1 000 MW ultra supercritical boiler [J]． Journal of Shanghai University of Electric Power, 2014, 30(4):339-345．
[9] 赵慧传，凌荣华，贾建民，等．新型耐热钢T23的特性与早期失效分析[J]．中国电机工程学报，2011，３１（２０）：１０７－１１３．
ZHAO Huichuan, LING Ronghua, JIA Jianmin, et al． New heat- resistant steel T23’s performance characteriscitcs and early failure [J]． Proceedings of the CSEE, 2011, 31(20): 107-113.
[10] 陈伯蠡．焊接冶金原理[M]．北京：清华大学出版社，1991：496-536．
[11] 王学，李夕强，杨超，等．超超临界锅炉塔式炉T23水冷壁早期失效分析[J]．中国电力，２０１４，４７（１２）：２１－２７．
WANG Xue, LI Xiqiang, YANG Chao, et al． Analysis on early stage failure of welded T23 steel waterwall in USC tower-boilers[J]． Electric Power, 2014, 47(12): 21-27．
[12] 王学，李夕强，杨超，等．超超临界锅炉水冷壁T23接头时效性能[J]．动力工程学报，２０１５，３５（４）：３２５－３３０．
WANG Xue, LI Xiqiang, YANG Chao, et al． Aging properties of T23 steel weldment in water wall of USC boilers[J]． Journal of Chinese of Power Engineering, 2015, 35(4): 325-330．

[1]	王卫良, 王玉召, 吕俊复, 邵文君, 迟忠君, 张戟. 大型燃煤电站锅炉能效评价与节能分析[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(4): 177-185.
[2]	申巍, 高华, 张鹏, 左坤, 田毅, 杨文博, 袁正康. 高聚物复合绝缘子紫外老化性能研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(9): 73-78,85.
[3]	马大卫, 何军, 张其良, 黄齐顺, 张本耀, 程靖, 朱帅. SCR脱硝系统性能及空气预热器阻力上升分析[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52(6): 187-192.
[4]	李超. 加装SCR脱硝装置对空预器冷端腐蚀的影响解析[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(5): 47-51.
[5]	陶雷行, 翁杰, 李晓峰, 岳春妹, 王剑, 艾春美, 董飞英. 燃煤烟气超低排放全流程协同削减三氧化硫效果分析[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51(3): 177-184.
[6]	高智溥, 胡冬, 张志刚, 郭婷婷, 王海刚, 陈坤洋. 碱性吸附剂脱除SO₃技术在大型燃煤机组中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(7): 102-108.
[7]	潘栋, 李淑宏, 景云辉, 徐晓涛, 舒凯, 杨世极, 牛国平. 超低排放电站锅炉SCR脱硝装置的故障诊断及运行优化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(3): 41-45.
[8]	陈东旭, 胡磊, 王学, 孙建华, 孙松涛, 郭美华. 国内外焊后热处理标准对新型9%Cr热强钢管道的适用性[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(11): 78-83.
[9]	刘毅，张国栋，赵彦芬，李建，周昌玉. 含缺陷在役P92蒸汽管道与时间相关的失效评定曲线及缺陷评定[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(5): 67-71.
[10]	刘宇钢，易广宙，. 燃煤发电机组锅炉余热利用系统探讨[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(10): 1-6.
[11]	王建峰，刘沛奇，尤良洲，晏敏，朱跃. 飞灰含氨量对脱硝装置氨逃逸测定的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(4): 44-46.
[12]	屠士凤, 章卫军, 叶国满. 智能优化控制降低SCR对空气预热器的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(9): 29-34.
[13]	王学, 李夕强, 杨超, 葛兆祥, 杨贤彪, 任遥遥. 超超临界塔式炉T23水冷壁早期失效分析[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(12): 21-27.
[14]	惠润堂, 韦飞, 王宝德, 杨爱勇. SCR法烟气脱硝后空气预热器堵塞及应对措施[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(10): 110-112.
[15]	陈珣, 段学农, 陈一平, 朱光明, 王敦敦. 进风加热方式对空气预热器热力性能的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2014, 47(10): 103-109.

预热和焊后热处理对T23钢接头力学性能的影响

Effects of Preheating and Post-Weld Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of T23 Steel Weldment

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

模态框（Modal）标题

预热和焊后热处理对T23钢接头力学性能的影响

Effects of Preheating and Post-Weld Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of T23 Steel Weldment

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics