中国电力 ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (6): 102-109.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202312056
收稿日期:
2023-12-14
出版日期:
2024-06-28
发布日期:
2024-06-25
作者简介:
董杰(1987—),男,通信作者,工程师,从事油气试验研究,E-mail:632655901@qq.com
基金资助:
Jie DONG(), Bo YANG, Guoxin YI, Haichuan HE, Le MA
Received:
2023-12-14
Online:
2024-06-28
Published:
2024-06-25
Supported by:
摘要:
目前电力系统环保型SF6/CF4混合绝缘气体在GIS设备上的配气成本较高,现场选择过充SF6气体以保证其绝缘和灭弧性能,不符合使用该混合气体以实现环保和防液化的目的。为此,提出了基于单一质量流量控制器的环保型SF6/CF4混合绝缘气体分时段交替配气优化方法。通过分时段交替配气即时混匀技术,分析并优化了源于共用气路管道残余气体导致的配气误差,研究了SF6气体输出时间修正技术及最末时段时间再分配方法,进一步降低了充入气体混合比误差。模拟实验表明,该方法的即时混合比与24 h后混合比相对于目标值偏差均小于±0.5个百分点,符合DL/T 2243—2021标准要求。
董杰, 杨博, 伊国鑫, 何海川, 马乐. 电力环保型混合绝缘气体配气方法优化[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(6): 102-109.
Jie DONG, Bo YANG, Guoxin YI, Haichuan HE, Le MA. Distribution Optimization Method for Power Environment-Friendly Mixed Insulation Gas[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(6): 102-109.
T/s | 周期/轮 | SF6检测值占比/% | 个百分点 | |||||||||||||||||||||
实验1 | 实验2 | 实验3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | 48 | 59.95 | 60.17 | 60.26 | 60.72 | 61.87 | 62.19 | 60.69 | 1.70 | 61.03 | 1.71 | 0.34 | ||||||||||||
20 | 24 | 56.18 | 57.05 | 56.06 | 56.37 | 55.81 | 56.11 | 56.02 | 0.34 | 56.51 | 0.86 | 0.49 | ||||||||||||
30 | 16 | 53.30 | 53.96 | 52.55 | 53.47 | 53.29 | 54.24 | 53.05 | 0.81 | 53.89 | 0.72 | 0.84 | ||||||||||||
40 | 12 | 51.12 | 53.46 | 52.38 | 53.51 | 51.02 | 52.98 | 51.51 | 1.47 | 53.32 | 0.55 | 1.81 | ||||||||||||
60 | 8 | 48.17 | 52.25 | 48.89 | 52.67 | 50.33 | 52.76 | 49.13 | 2.24 | 52.56 | 0.52 | 3.43 | ||||||||||||
80 | 6 | 47.91 | 51.71 | 46.95 | 51.83 | 44.83 | 51.53 | 46.56 | 3.38 | 51.69 | 0.29 | 5.13 |
表 1 不同周期下SF6/CF4混气配气实验结果
Table 1 The results of SF6/CF4 mixed gas distribution test under different cycles
T/s | 周期/轮 | SF6检测值占比/% | 个百分点 | |||||||||||||||||||||
实验1 | 实验2 | 实验3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | 48 | 59.95 | 60.17 | 60.26 | 60.72 | 61.87 | 62.19 | 60.69 | 1.70 | 61.03 | 1.71 | 0.34 | ||||||||||||
20 | 24 | 56.18 | 57.05 | 56.06 | 56.37 | 55.81 | 56.11 | 56.02 | 0.34 | 56.51 | 0.86 | 0.49 | ||||||||||||
30 | 16 | 53.30 | 53.96 | 52.55 | 53.47 | 53.29 | 54.24 | 53.05 | 0.81 | 53.89 | 0.72 | 0.84 | ||||||||||||
40 | 12 | 51.12 | 53.46 | 52.38 | 53.51 | 51.02 | 52.98 | 51.51 | 1.47 | 53.32 | 0.55 | 1.81 | ||||||||||||
60 | 8 | 48.17 | 52.25 | 48.89 | 52.67 | 50.33 | 52.76 | 49.13 | 2.24 | 52.56 | 0.52 | 3.43 | ||||||||||||
80 | 6 | 47.91 | 51.71 | 46.95 | 51.83 | 44.83 | 51.53 | 46.56 | 3.38 | 51.69 | 0.29 | 5.13 |
周期/s | 混合比理论 计算值/% | 24 h后混合比 试验结果/% | 差值/ 个百分点 | |||
10 | 61.95 | 61.03 | 0.92 | |||
20 | 56.10 | 56.51 | −0.41 | |||
30 | 54.21 | 53.89 | 0.32 | |||
40 | 53.28 | 53.32 | −0.04 | |||
60 | 52.36 | 52.56 | −0.20 | |||
80 | 51.90 | 51.69 | 0.21 |
表 2 混合比理论计算值与实验结果对照
Table 2 The comparison table of theoretical calculation value and experimental results of mixing ratio
周期/s | 混合比理论 计算值/% | 24 h后混合比 试验结果/% | 差值/ 个百分点 | |||
10 | 61.95 | 61.03 | 0.92 | |||
20 | 56.10 | 56.51 | −0.41 | |||
30 | 54.21 | 53.89 | 0.32 | |||
40 | 53.28 | 53.32 | −0.04 | |||
60 | 52.36 | 52.56 | −0.20 | |||
80 | 51.90 | 51.69 | 0.21 |
T/s | 周期数 | SF6检测值占比/% | 百分点 | |||||||||||||||||||||
实验1 | 实验2 | 实验3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | 48 | 51.15 | 51.37 | 50.26 | 50.52 | 51.47 | 51.89 | 50.96 | 1.23 | 51.26 | 1.35 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||
20 | 24 | 49.45 | 50.03 | 49.46 | 49.74 | 49.13 | 49.31 | 49.35 | 0.38 | 49.69 | 0.73 | 0.35 | ||||||||||||
30 | 18 | 49.07 | 49.73 | 49.75 | 50.37 | 48.87 | 50.26 | 49.23 | 0.94 | 50.12 | 0.68 | 0.89 |
表 3 共用气体管道优化后不同周期下SF6/CF4混合气体配气实验结果
Table 3 The results of SF6/CF4 mixed gas distribution test under different cycles after optimization of common gas pipeline
T/s | 周期数 | SF6检测值占比/% | 百分点 | |||||||||||||||||||||
实验1 | 实验2 | 实验3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | 48 | 51.15 | 51.37 | 50.26 | 50.52 | 51.47 | 51.89 | 50.96 | 1.23 | 51.26 | 1.35 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||
20 | 24 | 49.45 | 50.03 | 49.46 | 49.74 | 49.13 | 49.31 | 49.35 | 0.38 | 49.69 | 0.73 | 0.35 | ||||||||||||
30 | 18 | 49.07 | 49.73 | 49.75 | 50.37 | 48.87 | 50.26 | 49.23 | 0.94 | 50.12 | 0.68 | 0.89 |
实验条件 | 实验终压/MPa | SF6检测值占比/% | 个百分点 | |||||||||||||||||||||
实验1 | 实验2 | 实验3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | |||||||||||||||||||
1) | 0.201 | 39.86 | 40.05 | 39.78 | 39.89 | 40.12 | 40.29 | 39.92 | 0.36 | 40.08 | 0.41 | 0.16 | ||||||||||||
2) | 0.303 | 45.21 | 45.50 | 45.03 | 45.47 | 44.85 | 45.19 | 45.03 | 0.33 | 45.41 | 0.35 | 0.38 | ||||||||||||
3) | 0.402 | 49.66 | 49.98 | 49.85 | 49.95 | 49.81 | 50.11 | 49.77 | 0.16 | 50.01 | 0.14 | 0.24 | ||||||||||||
4) | 0.503 | 54.79 | 54.95 | 54.58 | 54.75 | 55.17 | 55.43 | 54.85 | 0.45 | 55.04 | 0.52 | 0.19 | ||||||||||||
5) | 0.601 | 60.13 | 60.34 | 60.21 | 60.47 | 59.98 | 60.29 | 60.11 | 0.16 | 60.37 | 0.13 | 0.26 |
表 4 SF6/CF4混合气体配气优化方法模拟实验结果
Table 4 Simulation test of SF6/CF4 mixed gas optimization method
实验条件 | 实验终压/MPa | SF6检测值占比/% | 个百分点 | |||||||||||||||||||||
实验1 | 实验2 | 实验3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | |||||||||||||||||||
1) | 0.201 | 39.86 | 40.05 | 39.78 | 39.89 | 40.12 | 40.29 | 39.92 | 0.36 | 40.08 | 0.41 | 0.16 | ||||||||||||
2) | 0.303 | 45.21 | 45.50 | 45.03 | 45.47 | 44.85 | 45.19 | 45.03 | 0.33 | 45.41 | 0.35 | 0.38 | ||||||||||||
3) | 0.402 | 49.66 | 49.98 | 49.85 | 49.95 | 49.81 | 50.11 | 49.77 | 0.16 | 50.01 | 0.14 | 0.24 | ||||||||||||
4) | 0.503 | 54.79 | 54.95 | 54.58 | 54.75 | 55.17 | 55.43 | 54.85 | 0.45 | 55.04 | 0.52 | 0.19 | ||||||||||||
5) | 0.601 | 60.13 | 60.34 | 60.21 | 60.47 | 59.98 | 60.29 | 60.11 | 0.16 | 60.37 | 0.13 | 0.26 |
1 | 和彦淼, 黄印, 颜湘莲, 等. SF6混合气体和环保替代气体设备标准化研究[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (3): 95- 102. |
HE Yanmiao, HUANG Yin, YAN Xianglian, et al. Standardization research on SF6 mixed gas and eco-friendly alternative gas equipment[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (3): 95- 102. | |
2 | 马汝括, 董杰, 王雅湉, 等. 基于神经网络的高寒地区CF4和SF6/CF4检测[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (3): 103- 112. |
MA Rukuo, DONG Jie, WANG Yatian, et al. Neural network-based CF4 and SF6/CF4 detection in high altitude and extreme cold regions[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (3): 103- 112. | |
3 | 刘宝升, 王涤, 马爱军, 等. 封闭环境空气局部放电组分研究[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2021, 49 (9): 21- 28. |
LIU Baosheng, WANG Di, MA Aijun, et al. Study on the components of air under partial discharge condition in closed space[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49 (9): 21- 28. | |
4 | KIEFFEL Y, BIQUEZ F. SF6 alternative development for high voltage switchgears[C]//2015 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC). Seattle, WA, USA. IEEE, 2015: 379–383. |
5 | 杨光, 章海斌, 吴胜, 等. 基于电力物联网技术的SF6自动补气装置[J]. 安徽电气工程职业技术学院学报, 2021, 26 (4): 87- 90. |
YANG Guang, ZHANG Haibin, WU Sheng, et al. SF6 gas automatic refilling equipment based on power IoT technology[J]. Journal of Anhui Electrical Engineering Professional Technique College, 2021, 26 (4): 87- 90. | |
6 | 李学斌, 鲁旭臣, 李斌, 等. SF6/N2流注放电仿真及协同效应研究[J]. 中国电力, 2019, 52 (3): 102- 108. |
LI Xuebin, LU Xuchen, LI Bin, et al. Research on streamer discharge simulation and synergistic effects of SF6/N2[J]. Electric Power, 2019, 52 (3): 102- 108. | |
7 | KIEFFEL Y, IRWIN T, PONCHON P, et al. Green gas to replace SF6 in electrical grids[J]. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 2016, 14 (2): 32- 39. |
8 | 颜湘莲, 高克利, 郑宇, 等. SF6混合气体及替代气体研究进展[J]. 电网技术, 2018, 42 (6): 1837- 1844. |
YAN Xianglian, GAO Keli, ZHENG Yu, et al. Progress of gas mixture and alternative gas of SF6[J]. Power System Technology, 2018, 42 (6): 1837- 1844. | |
9 | 赵晓民, 韩国辉, 刘文魁, 等. 高压断路器用SF6/CF4混合气体状态参数计算及液化分析[J]. 高压电器, 2016, 52 (12): 204- 208. |
ZHAO Xiaomin, HAN Guohui, LIU Wenkui, et al. Liquefaction and state parameters of SF6/CF4 mixed gas in high voltage circuit breaker[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2016, 52 (12): 204- 208. | |
10 | 汤昕, 廖四军, 杨鑫. SF6混合/替代气体绝缘性能的研究进展[J]. 绝缘材料, 2014, 47 (6): 18- 22. |
TANG Xin, LIAO Sijun, YANG Xin. Research progress in insulating property of SF6 mixing/substituting gases[J]. Insulating Materials, 2014, 47 (6): 18- 22. | |
11 | 周倩, 柯锟, 张晓星, 等. 基于SF6混合气体绝缘性能的设备补气策略研究[J]. 电力工程技术, 2021, 40 (4): 175- 181. |
ZHOU Qian, KE Kun, ZHANG Xiaoxing, et al. Air supply strategy of equipment based on SF6 mixed gas insulation performance[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2021, 40 (4): 175- 181. | |
12 | 胡宗杰, 陈炯, 邓云坤, 等. 工频击穿放电下(CF3)2CFCN/CO2混合气体分解特性分析[J]. 电力科学与技术学报, 2023, 38 (2): 150- 160. |
HU Zongjie, CHEN Jiong, DENG Yunkun, et al. Decomposition characteristics of (CF3)2CFCN/CO2 mixed gases under power frequency breakdown discharge[J]. Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology, 2023, 38 (2): 150- 160. | |
13 | 马凤翔, 朱峰, 袁小芳, 等. 混合气体绝缘设备充、补气技术研究[J]. 安徽电气工程职业技术学院学报, 2019, 24 (1): 53- 58. |
MA Fengxiang, ZHU Feng, YUAN Xiaofang, et al. Research on gas filling and supplying technology of mixed gas insulation equipment[J]. Journal of Anhui Electrical Engineering Professional Technique College, 2019, 24 (1): 53- 58. | |
14 | 国家能源局. 六氟化硫混合绝缘气体充补气技术规范: DL/T 2243—2021[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2021. |
15 | 邵先军, 谢成, 丁五行, 等. C4F7N质量流量转换系数测定方法[J]. 高电压技术, 2022, 48 (5): 1791- 1797. |
SHAO Xianjun, XIE Cheng, DING Wuxing, et al. Measurement method of C4F7N mass flow conversion coefficient[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2022, 48 (5): 1791- 1797. | |
16 | 谢辉, 刘伟, 张红飞, 等. SF6混合绝缘气体现场运维技术的研究[J]. 安徽电气工程职业技术学院学报, 2017, 22 (1): 7- 12. |
XIE Hui, LIU Wei, ZHANG Hongfei, et al. Research about on-site operation and maintenance of SF6 mixed gases[J]. Journal of Anhui Electrical Engineering Professional Technique College, 2017, 22 (1): 7- 12. | |
17 | 李文广, 郑一博, 李大卫, 等. SF6混合气体状态检测及混气充入技术综述[J]. 华北电力技术, 2017, (12): 30- 34, 39. |
LI Wenguang, ZHENG Yibo, LI Dawei, et al. Review of SF6 mixture status detection and charging technology[J]. North China Electric Power, 2017, (12): 30- 34, 39. | |
18 | 冯崧, 曾祥进, 黄瑜豪. 改进高斯烟团模型的多气体源泄露扩散模型[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23 (31): 13619- 13625. |
FENG Song, ZENG Xiangjin, HUANG Yuhao. Multi-gas source leakage diffusion model based on improved Gaussian puff model[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2023, 23 (31): 13619- 13625. | |
19 | 周安春, 高理迎, 冀肖彤, 等. SF6/N2混合气体用于GIS母线的研究与应用[J]. 电网技术, 2018, 42 (10): 3429- 3435. |
ZHOU Anchun, GAO Liying, JI Xiaotong, et al. Research and application of SF6/N2 mixed gas used in GIS bus[J]. Power System Technology, 2018, 42 (10): 3429- 3435. | |
20 | EVANS L. Four important linear partial differential equations[M]//Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, 2010: 17–90. |
21 | 孟岩, 李振, 陈书豪, 等. 缩短高压设备SF6/CF4气体混合均匀时间的方法及装置[J]. 高电压技术, 2019, 45 (zk2): 363- 366. |
MENG Yan, LI Zhen, CHEN Shuhao, et al. The method and device for shortening the mixing time of SF6/CF4 gas in high voltage equipment[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2019, 45 (zk2): 363- 366. | |
22 | 李飞高, 李瑄. 具有压力自动控制功能的SF6气体密度检验装置[J]. 制造业自动化, 2022, 44 (1): 170- 173. |
LI Feigao, LI Xuan. SF6 gas density inspection device with automatic pressure control function[J]. Manufacturing Automation, 2022, 44 (1): 170- 173. | |
23 | 杨文良, 王振中, 王琰, 等. SF6/CF4气体绝缘设备气体泄漏率准确测试方法分析[J]. 内蒙古电力技术, 2021, 39 (2): 28- 31. |
YANG Wenliang, WANG Zhenzhong, WANG Yan, et al. Analysis of accurate testing method for gas leakage rate of SF6/CF4 gas insulated equipment[J]. Inner Mongolia Electric Power, 2021, 39 (2): 28- 31. | |
24 |
KISELEV S B, ELY J F. A new analytical formulation for the generalized corresponding states model for thermodynamic and surface properties in pure fluids[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61 (15): 5107- 5113.
DOI |
25 | 陈远东, 郑宇, 孟辉, 等. 低温SF6/CF4混气中绝缘子闪络电压的概率分布[J]. 高压电器, 2022, 58 (7): 229- 236. |
CHEN Yuandong, ZHENG Yu, MENG Hui, et al. Probability distribution of insulator flashover voltage in low temperature SF6/CF4Gas mixture[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2022, 58 (7): 229- 236. |
No related articles found! |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||