励磁方式差异对RAM发电机过流保护整定的影响

doi:10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202211023

中国电力 ›› 2023, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 86-93.DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202211023

励磁方式差异对RAM发电机过流保护整定的影响

李润培¹, 桂林¹, 吴龙², 谢小荣¹, 王祥珩¹

1. 电力系统及发电设备控制和仿真国家重点实验室（清华大学电机系），北京 100084;
2. 南京南瑞继保电气有限公司，江苏南京 211102

收稿日期:2022-11-07 修回日期:2023-01-04 出版日期:2023-03-28 发布日期:2023-03-28
作者简介:李润培(1998-),男,硕士研究生,从事相复励系统故障分析研究,E-mail:1rp199855@163.com;桂林(1974-),男,通信作者,博士,副教授,从事大机组保护及故障分析研究,E-mail:guilin99@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn;吴龙(1970-),男,硕士,高级工程师(研究员级),从事发电机励磁及电力电子应用研究,E-mail:wul@nrec.com
基金资助:
国家杰出青年科学基金资助项目（51925701）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（52077115）。

Influence of Excitation Mode Difference on RAM Generator Overcurrent Protection Setting

LI Runpei¹, GUI Lin¹, WU long², XIE Xiaorong¹, WANG Xiangheng¹

1. State Key Lab of Control and Simulation of Power Systems and Generation Equipment (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University), Beijing 100084, China;
2. NR Electric Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211102, China

Received:2022-11-07 Revised:2023-01-04 Online:2023-03-28 Published:2023-03-28
Supported by:
This work is supported by National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar (No.51925701), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.52077115).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 中广核下属电站控制棒驱动机构电源系统（rotating asynchronous machine，RAM）包含上电、中船和热蒙3种机型，除上电机型为自并励励磁方式外，其他2种机型均为相复励励磁方式。但各电站在整定不同励磁方式RAM发电机的过流保护时，没有考虑励磁方式差异对过流保护定值及延时整定的影响，存在过流保护拒动以及与其他异常工况保护失配的隐患（误动作）。建立了不同励磁方式RAM发电机的PSACD模型，通过理论分析和仿真说明了励磁方式差异对RAM发电机机端短路电流衰减过程的影响，并通过动模实验验证了仿真分析的正确性。基于理论分析和仿真结果，对不同励磁方式下RAM发电机过流保护的定值及延时进行合理整定，并在中广核下属电站得到实际应用。

关键词: 棒控电源, 相复励, 机端短路, 保护配置及定值整定

Abstract: The rotating asynchronous machine (RAM) system in the power stations of China General Nuclear Power Group (CGN) includes three types of generators —i.e., Shangdian generator, Zhongchuan generator and Remeng generator. The Shangdian generator is under self-shunt excitation, and the other two types are under phase compound excitation. When setting the overcurrent protection of RAM generators with different excitation modes, the power stations don’t consider the influence of excitation difference on value setting and delay time setting of overcurrent protection, and there may be dangers of overcurrent protection refusal and protection mismatch with other abnormal condition protections (malfunction). In this paper, the PSACD models of RAM generators with different excitation modes are established. The influence of excitation difference on the short circuit current decay process of RAM generator is illustrated by theoretical analysis and simulation, and the correctness of simulation analysis is verified by prototype experiment. Based on the theoretical analysis and simulation results, the setting value and delay time of RAM generator overcurrent protection under different excitation modes are set reasonably, which has been applied in the power stations of CGN.

Key words: RAM, phase compound excitation, generator terminal short-circuit, protection configuration and setting

李润培, 桂林, 吴龙, 谢小荣, 王祥珩. 励磁方式差异对RAM发电机过流保护整定的影响[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56(3): 86-93.

LI Runpei, GUI Lin, WU long, XIE Xiaorong, WANG Xiangheng. Influence of Excitation Mode Difference on RAM Generator Overcurrent Protection Setting[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56(3): 86-93.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202211023

https://www.electricpower.com.cn/CN/Y2023/V56/I3/86

参考文献

[1] 郑宽, 徐志成, 鲁刚, 等. 高比例新能源电力系统演化进程中核电与新能源协调发展策略[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(7): 27–35
ZHENG Kuan, XU Zhicheng, LU Gang, et al. Coordinated development strategy for nuclear power and new energy in the evolution process of power system with high penetration of new energy[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(7): 27–35
[2] 白青峰. 可再生能源发电与核电协调调度及发展[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53(2): 105–111
BAI Qingfeng. Coordinative dispatch and development of renewable energy and nuclear power generation[J]. Electric Power, 2020, 53(2): 105–111
[3] 张萌, 张志刚. COP 26减碳目标下核电发展的必要性与可行性研究[J]. 核安全, 2022, 21(4): 26–31
ZHANG Meng, ZHANG Zhigang. Necessity and feasibility study of nuclear power development under COP 26 carbon reduction goals[J]. Nuclear Safety, 2022, 21(4): 26–31
[4] 沈志华, 凌志斌. 核电棒电源系统的设计探究[J]. 发电设备, 2018, 32(4): 268–271
SHEN Zhihua, LING Zhibin. Design of a power system for the control rod drive mechanism of nuclear power plants[J]. Power Equipment, 2018, 32(4): 268–271
[5] 孟子荣. 核电站控制棒驱动机构电源机组励磁方式的选择[J]. 电气开关, 2015, 53(5): 96–97, 108
MENG Zirong. Selection of exciting system of M- G set in a nuclear power plant[J]. Electric Switchgear, 2015, 53(5): 96–97, 108
[6] 肖项涛, 郝亮亮, 梁郑秋, 等. 核电RAM系统不正常工况分析及失磁保护优化[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50(15): 109–118
XIAO Xiangtao, HAO Liangliang, LIANG Zhengqiu, et al. Analysis of abnormal working conditions and optimization of loss of field protection of a nuclear power plant RAM system[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50(15): 109–118
[7] 刘金豆. 核电站棒电源继电保护系统的分析优化及研究[D]. 上海: 上海发电设备成套设计研究院有限责任公司, 2021.
LIU Jindou. Analysis and optimization of relay protection system for rod power supply in nuclear power plant [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Power Equipment Research Institute Company, 2021.
[8] 刘振武, 魏建忠, 高仕斌. 自并励发电机后备保护改进方案[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2013, 25(2): 53–57
LIU Zhenwu, WEI Jianzhong, GAO Shibin. Improved scheme of backup protection for generators with self-shunt excitation[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2013, 25(2): 53–57
[9] 朱华杰. 自并励发电机后备保护研究[J]. 中国电力教育, 2007(增刊3): 161–162
ZHU Huajie. Research on backup protection of self-shunt generator[J]. China Electric Power Education, 2007(S3): 161–162
[10] 张兵海. 自并励汽轮发电机相间短路后备保护配置与整定的探讨[J]. 继电器, 2005, 33(5): 63–66,71
ZHANG Binghai. Configuration and setting research on back-up protection of turbine generator with self-shunt excitation[J]. Relay, 2005, 33(5): 63–66,71
[11] 兀鹏越, 侯瑞, 杨奎刚, 等. 发电机记忆过流保护动作分析[J]. 电力建设, 2012, 33(1): 57–60
WU Pengyue, HOU Rui, YANG Kuigang, et al. Analysis on memory over-current protection of generator[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2012, 33(1): 57–60
[12] 李登峰, 杨旼才, 刘育明, 等. 基于SVR数据驱动的发电机进相极限最优化求解方法[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(8): 136–143, 153
LI Dengfeng, YANG Mincai, LIU Yuming, et al. SVR data-driven optimization of generator leading phase operation limit[J]. Electric Power, 2021, 54(8): 136–143, 153
[13] 周璧如. 电力系统研究用的励磁系统数学模型[J]. 电力技术, 1987, 20(12): 57–61
ZHOU Biru. Mathematical model of excitation system for power system research[J]. Electric Power, 1987, 20(12): 57–61
[14] 魏建勋. 一种同步发电机相复励励磁系统简化模型[J]. 船电技术, 2014, 34(4): 28–31
WEI Jianxun. A simplified model of phase compound excitation system for synchronous generator[J]. Marine Electric & Electronic Engineering, 2014, 34(4): 28–31
[15] 杨国豪. 相复励装置的全补偿分析[J]. 航海技术, 2000(1): 62–64
YANG Guohao. Full compensation analysis of phase compound excitation device[J]. Marine Technology, 2000(1): 62–64
[16] 黄曼磊. H∞控制理论在船舶电站中的应用研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2003
HUANG Manlei. Application research of H∞ control theory in ship power station[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2003.
[17] 史际昌. 电磁式相复励自励恒压系统最佳参数的计算[J]. 大连海运学院学报, 1986, 12(3): 48–54
SHI Jichang. Optimal parameters for designing the electromagnetic self-excited constant voltage system[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 1986, 12(3): 48–54
[18] 茅于杭. 相复励调节器的运行特性[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 1963, 3(6): 39–55
MAO Yuhang. Operation characteristics of phase compound excitation regulator[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 1963, 3(6): 39–55

励磁方式差异对RAM发电机过流保护整定的影响

Influence of Excitation Mode Difference on RAM Generator Overcurrent Protection Setting

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

模态框（Modal）标题

励磁方式差异对RAM发电机过流保护整定的影响

Influence of Excitation Mode Difference on RAM Generator Overcurrent Protection Setting

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics